Gallagher et al v. Bayer AG et al

Filing 87

ORDER REQUIRING MEET AND CONFER SESSIONS CONCERNING DISCOVERY DISPUTE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/30/2015. Lead trial counsel shall file a Joint Report on December 7, 2015 by 2 pm. If all the problems have not been resolved, lead tri al counsel shall meet in person from 9:30 am to 12:30 pm in the Attorney's Lounge on the 18th floor of this courthouse on December 8, 2015 to attempt to narrow the issues further. I will then hear argument on any unresolved matters at the end of the Case Management Conference calendar that commences at 2 pm December 8, 2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 COLLEEN GALLAGHER, et al., Case No. 14-cv-04601-WHO Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 BAYER AG, et al., Defendants. ORDER REQUIRING MEET AND CONFER SESSIONS CONCERNING DISCOVERY DISPUTE Re: Dkt. Nos. 85, 86 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 It is always disheartening when lawyers cannot muster the civility and cooperation 14 necessary to produce a joint letter describing their disagreements. That is such a low bar. But 15 since it appears too high in this case, I ORDER that: 16 1. Lead trial counsel meet and confer this week in good faith for no less than three hours 17 concerning their discovery disputes. I normally require a face to face meeting, because it 18 is harder to be discourteous and unengaged in person, but given the timing I am requiring I 19 will allow this session to occur over the telephone. 20 2. Lead trial counsel shall file a Joint Report on December 7, 2015 by 2 pm. 21 3. If all the problems have not been resolved, lead trial counsel shall meet in person from 22 9:30 am to 12:30 pm in the Attorney’s Lounge on the 18th floor of this courthouse on 23 December 8, 2015 to attempt to narrow the issues further. 24 I will then hear argument on any unresolved matters at the end of the Case Management 25 Conference calendar that commences at 2 pm December 8, 2015. 26 In an effort to assist the meet and confer sessions, I will offer some preliminary 27 observations. It appears that many of plaintiffs’ requests are relevant but overbroad. It is 28 impossible to tell from the responses how the defendants’ objections impacted their actual 1 production of documents. I encourage both sides to be reasonable and clear in their discussions so 2 that the relevant, material documents are produced and the issues of legitimate disagreement, if 3 any, are clarified. The defendants have also raised in their statement to me plaintiffs’ failure to 4 respond to discovery. While this is an issue that has not been addressed jointly yet, I expect the 5 parties to address it in the meet and confer sessions and to describe any lingering issues in the 6 Joint Report on December 7, 2015. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 30, 2015 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?