Eng v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Filing
7
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/22/14. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DAVID K. ENG,
Case No. 14-cv-04626-JCS
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR
UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE
CONFERENCE
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 2-3, the court refers this
foreclosure-related action to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Unit for a telephone
conference to assess this case's suitability for mediation or a settlement conference. Plaintiff and
defendants' counsel shall participate in a telephone conference, to be scheduled by the ADR Unit
as soon as possible but no later than November 20, 2014.
Plaintiff and defendant's counsel shall be prepared to discuss the following subjects:
17
(1) Identification and description of claims and alleged defects in loan documents.
18
(2) Prospects for loan modification.
19
(3) Prospects for settlement.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The parties need not submit written materials to the ADR Unit for the telephone
conference.
In preparation for the telephone conference, plaintiff shall do the following:
(1) Review relevant loan documents and investigate the claims to determine whether
they have merit.
(2) If plaintiff is seeking a loan modification to resolve all or some of the claims,
plaintiff shall prepare a current, accurate financial statement and gather all of the
information and documents customarily needed to support a loan modification
1
request. Further, plaintiff shall immediately notify defendants' counsel of the
2
request for a loan modification.
3
(3) Provide counsel for defendants with information necessary to evaluate the
4
prospects for loan modification, in the form of a financial statement, worksheet or
5
application customarily used by financial institutions.
6
7
8
9
10
(4) In preparation for the telephone conference, counsel for defendants shall do the
following.
(5) If defendants are unable or unwilling to do a loan modification after receiving
notice of plaintiff's request, counsel for defendants shall promptly notify plaintiff to
that effect.
(6) Arrange for a representative of each defendant with full settlement authority to
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
participate in the telephone conference.
12
The ADR Unit will notify the parties of the date and time that the telephone conference
13
will be held. After the telephone conference, the ADR Unit will advise the court of its
14
recommendation for further ADR proceedings.
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
Dated: October 22, 2014
17
18
19
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DAVID K. ENG,
Case No. 14-cv-04626-JCS
Plaintiff,
8
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
9
10
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on 10/22/2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
18
David K. Eng
5347 Bancroft Avenue
Oakland, CA 94601-5807
19
20
Dated: 10/22/2014
21
22
23
24
25
Richard W. Wieking
Clerk, United States District Court
By:________________________
Karen Hom, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable JOSEPH C. SPERO
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?