Arredondo v. Olson et al

Filing 60

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING DEFENDANTS 57 MOTION; REOPENING CASE, LIFTING STAY, AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALFREDO RAIGOSA ARREDONDO, Case No. 14-cv-04687-HSG Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 THOMAS DRAGER, et al., Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 57 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION; REOPENING CASE, LIFTING STAY, AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 12 13 Plaintiff, a California prisoner currently incarcerated at Calipatria State Prison, filed this 14 pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, regarding events that took place while he was 15 incarcerated at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”). This case has been administratively closed and 16 stayed for the purposes of settlement proceedings. Docket No. 57. Defendants have filed a 17 motion requesting that the Court lift the stay for the limited purpose of considering Defendants’ 18 motion for reconsideration, and that the Court grant Defendants leave to file a motion for 19 reconsideration. The Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. The case is re-opened and the stay is 20 lifted. Defendants may file the motion for reconsideration that is attached as Exhibit A to their 21 motion requesting that the Court lift the stay. Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants’ motion 22 for reconsideration within fourteen (14) days after the date the motion for reconsideration is filed. 23 This order terminates Docket No. 57. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: 8/24/2016 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?