Amgen Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc. et al

Filing 288

STIPULATION AND ORDER (#127 in 3:16-cv-02581-RS) (#287 in 3:14-cv-04741-RS) FOR CORRECTION OF THE DEADLINES FOR RESPONSES AND REPLIES TO SANDOZS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SET FORTH IN ECF DOCKET ENTRIES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/7/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Vernon M. Winters (SBN 130128)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104-1503
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Nicholas Groombridge (pro hac vice)
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON &
GARRISON LLP
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019-6064
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

Erik J. Olson (SBN 175815)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
755 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.494.0792
[e-mail]
Additional counsel listed below
Attorneys for Defendants Sandoz Inc., Sandoz
GmbH, Sandoz International GmbH, and Lek
Pharmaceuticals d.d.

Additional counsel listed below
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Amgen Inc.
and Amgen Manufacturing, Limited

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16
17

AMGEN INC. and
AMGEN MANUFACTURING, LIMITED,
Plaintiffs,
vs.

18
19
20
21

SANDOZ INC., SANDOZ INTERNATIONAL
GMBH, and SANDOZ GMBH
Defendants.

Case No. 3:14-cv-04741-RS
Case No. 3:16-cv-02581-RS
STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
CORRECTION OF THE DEADLINES
FOR RESPONSES AND REPLIES TO
SANDOZ’S MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT SET
FORTH IN ECF DOCKET ENTRIES

AMGEN INC. and
AMGEN MANUFACTURING, LIMITED,

22
23
24
25

Plaintiffs,
vs.
SANDOZ INC., SANDOZ INTERNATIONAL
GMBH, SANDOZ GMBH, and LEK
PHARMACEUTICALS D.D.

26
27

Defendants.

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR CORRECTION OF DOCKET DEADLINES

Case No. 3:14-cv-04741-RS
Case No. 3:16-cv-02581-RS

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiffs Amgen Inc. and Amgen Manufacturing,

2

Limited and Defendants Sandoz Inc., Sandoz International GmbH, Sandoz GmbH, and Lek

3

Pharmaceuticals d.d., through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

4

WHEREAS, the deadlines for responses and replies to dispositive motions are set in the

5

Court’s current Scheduling Orders (14-cv-04741 Dkt. No. 259; 16-cv-02581 Dkt. No. 91) as

6

November 13, 2017 and November 21, 2017, respectively;

7

WHEREAS, the ECF docket entries for Sandoz’s summary judgment motions (14-cv-

8

04741 Dkt. Nos. 280 & 281; 16-cv-02581 Dkt. Nos. 118 & 119) do not reflect the due dates set

9

forth in the Scheduling Orders and thus incorrectly state that “Responses due by

10
11

11/8/2017. Replies due by 11/15/2017”;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties request that the Court correct the response and reply

12

deadlines set forth in the ECF docket entries for Sandoz’s summary judgment motions (14-cv-

13

04741 Dkt. Nos. 280 & 281; 16-cv-02581 Dkt. Nos. 118 & 119).

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR CORRECTION OF DOCKET DEADLINES

Case No. 3:14-cv-04741-RS
Case No. 3:16-cv-02581-RS

1
2

Respectfully submitted,
Dated: November 7, 2017

6

By: /s/ Vernon M. Winters
Vernon M. Winters (SBN 130128)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104-1503
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

7

Attorneys for Amgen Inc. and Amgen Manufacturing, Ltd.

3
4
5

8
9
10
11
12
13

Dated: November 7, 2017

By: /s/ Stephen David Keane
Stephen David Keane (SBN 247588)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
12531 High Bluff Drive, Ste. 100
San Diego, California 92130
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Sandoz Inc., Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz
International GmbH, and Lek Pharmaceuticals d.d.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR CORRECTION OF DOCKET DEADLINES

Case No. 3:14-cv-04741-RS
Case No. 3:16-cv-02581-RS

1

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

2

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that concurrence in the filing

3

of this document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories shown above.

4

Dated: November 7, 2017
By: /s/ Vernon M. Winters
Vernon M. Winters

5
6
7
8
9
10

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12
13

Dated: ___________, 2017
11/7
THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR CORRECTION OF DOCKET DEADLINES

Case No. 3:14-cv-04741-RS
Case No. 3:16-cv-02581-RS