Hochstetler et al v. Pacific Gateway Concessions LLC
Filing
24
STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Initial Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 4/6/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/13/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/08/2015. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2015)
1
2
3
4
MARA E. ROSALES, State Bar No. 104844
mara@rosaleslawpartners.com
ROBERT D. SANFORD, State Bar No.129790
dusty@rosaleslawpartners.com
ROSALES LAW PARTNERS LLP
433 California Street, Suite 630
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
(415) 986-4760
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant
PACIFIC GATEWAY CONCESSIONS LLC.
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RACHEL HOCHSTETLER,
CIRENA TORRES,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
vs.
PACIFIC GATEWAY CONCESSIONS LLC, et
al.,
15
16
17
Defendants.
_______________________________________
PACIFIC GATEWAY CONCESSIONS LLC, et
al.,
18
Cross-Claimant,
19
20
vs.
POINT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cross-Defendant.
21
22
25
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED[
ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Plaintiffs Rachel Hochstetler and Cirena Torres and Defendant Pacific Gateway
Concessions LLC ("PGC") hereby stipulate as follows:
Recitals
26
27
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-04748-TEH
STIPULATION
23
24
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1.
The Initial Case Management Conference in this action is currently scheduled for
February 2, 2015, per the Clerk's Notice Scheduling Case Management Conference on
1
Stipulated Order Continuing CMC
Case No. 3:14-cv-04748-TEH
1
2
3
4
Reassignment (Docket 12).
2.
PGC filed a Cross-Claim against Cross-Defendant Point Solutions LLC on
December 26, 2014 (Docket 13), but Point Solutions has not yet appeared in this action.
3.
In the interest of efficient case management and minimizing the burden of the
5
action on the Court's resources, Plaintiffs and PGC agree that Point Solutions should participate
6
in the Initial Case Management Conference and the parties' conference required under Federal
7
Rule of Civil Procedure 26.
8
9
Stipulation
4.
Based on the foregoing recitals, Plaintiffs and Defendant PGC stipulate that the
10
Initial Case Management Conference should be continued from its present date of February 2,
11
2015 to a date which will allow Cross-Defendant Point Solutions to participate. The parties
12
agree that a continuance of 60 to 90 days should be sufficient.
13
5.
PGC shall file an administrative motion pursuant to Local Rule 7-11 requesting
14
that the Court continue the Initial Case Management Conference to a date between April 3, 2015
15
and May 4, 2015.
16
17
So Stipulated.
Dated: January 7, 2015
18
19
By:
/s/ Chant Yedalian
CHANT YEDALIAN
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
RACHEL HOCHSTETLER and CIRENA
TORRES
20
21
22
CHANT & COMPANY,
A Professional Law Corporation
Dated: January 7, 2015
ROSALES LAW PARTNERS LLP
23
By:
/s/ Robert D. Sanford
ROBERT D. SANFORD
Attorney for Defendant and Cross-Claimant
PACIFIC GATEWAY CONCESSIONS LLC
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stipulated Order Continuing CMC
Case No. 3:14-cv-04748-TEH
1
2
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered. The Initial Case Management Conference shall
3
April 13
occur on _________, 2015 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 12 on the 19th floor, United States District
_____
4
Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. Not less than seven days
5
prior, counsel shall submit a joint case management conference statement, and all other deadlines
6
are continued according to the new date of the Initial Case Management Conference.
7
08
Dated: January ___, 2015
nderson
NO
12
J
RT
13
e
lton E. H
dge The
u
15
A
H
ER
14
FO
11
LI
10
R NIA
_________________________________
Honorable Thelton E. Henderson
United States District Court Judge
UNIT
ED
9
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
8
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipulated Order Continuing CMC
Case No. 3:14-cv-04748-TEH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?