Federal Trade Commission v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 23 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 1 Complaint filed by AT&T Mobility LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/12/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD
EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C.
Michael K. Kellogg (pro hac vice)
Mark C. Hansen (pro hac vice)
Email: mkellogg@khhte.com
mhansen@khhte.com
1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400
Washington, D.C. 20036
Telephone:
(202) 326-7900
Facscimile: (202) 326-7999
6
7
8
9
10
Douglas W. Sullivan (SB No. 0088136)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 986-2800
Facsimile: (415) 986-2827
Attorneys for Defendant
AT&T MOBILITY LLC
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
San Francisco Division
14
15
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
16
Plaintiff,
17
18
v.
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, a limited liability
company,
19
Defendant.
Case No. 14-CV-04785-EMC
STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF FILING
DEADLINES FOR MOTION TO DISMISS,
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS,
AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
TO DISMISS, AND FOR SCHEDULING OF
HEARING AND INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
20
21
22
23
24
25
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, defendant AT&T Mobility LLC
26
(“AT&T”) and plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) (collectively, the “Parties”) hereby
27
stipulate to an extension of the filing deadline governing AT&T’s motion to dismiss, and hereby
28
STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF FILING DEADLINES
PAGE 1
14-CV-04785-EMC
1
file a stipulated request for a court order: (1) extending the deadlines governing (i) the FTC’s
2
opposition to AT&T’s motion to dismiss and (ii) AT&T’s reply in support of its motion to
3
dismiss; and (2) scheduling an initial case management conference and a hearing on AT&T’s
4
motion to dismiss. The Parties require additional time to investigate all relevant issues and to
5
submit their filings to the Court. The requested modifications will not affect the schedule for the
6
case. The Parties therefore stipulate to the following schedule:
7
Filing
Scheduled Due Date
Stipulated Due Date
Motion To Dismiss
December 29, 2014. See Fed.
R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(ii).
January 5, 2015
Opposition to Motion To
Dismiss
14 days after the motion to
dismiss is filed. See Civil
L.R. 7-3(a).
February 4, 2015
Reply in Support of
Motion To Dismiss
7 days after the opposition is
filed. See Civil L.R. 7-3(c).
February 18, 2015
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Proceeding
Hearing on Motion To
Dismiss
Stipulated Date
12
March 5, 2015
Initial Case Management
Conference
12
March 5, 2015
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the reasons for the requested modification are set forth in
17
18
a supporting declaration accompanying this request.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the
19
20
filing of this document from all other signatories and that I have on file all holograph signatures
21
for any signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature.
Respectfully submitted,
22
23
24
Dated:
December 11, 2014
25
KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD,
EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C.
By:
26
/s/ Michael K. Kellogg
Michael K. Kellogg
Attorney for Defendant
AT&T MOBILITY LLC
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF FILING DEADLINES
PAGE 2
14-CV-04785-EMC
1
Dated:
December 11, 2014
DAVID C. SHONKA
Acting General Counsel
2
By:
3
4
/s/ Evan Rose
Evan Rose
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
5
6
7
8
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
12/12/14
DATED: ____________________
UNIT
ED
11
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
TE
____________________________________
C
A
HONORABLET
EDWARD M. CHEN
S
13
RDE
IS SO O FIED
IT
DI
AS MO
NO
14
RT
15
J
ER
17
A
H
16
. Chen
ward M
udge Ed
LI
12
R NIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RED
FO
10
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF FILING DEADLINES
PAGE 3
14-CV-04785-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?