California Strawberry Commission v. Regents of the University of California, The

Filing 35

MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL re 32 Order; 33 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Regents of the University of California, The, 30 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFF CALIFORNIA STRAWBERRY COMMISSION'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by California Strawberry Commission. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 17, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

CALIFORNIA STRAWBERRY
COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10
11

v.

Case No. 14-cv-04801-JST
MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL
Re: ECF Nos. 30, 32, 33

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA, THE,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendant.
12
The parties filed a stipulation of dismissal dated February 11, 2015, stating that they have
13
agreed to a settlement of this action. ECF No. 30. Since the stipulation was signed by all parties
14
who have appeared, it was effective without court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
15
Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Nonetheless, pursuant to the stipulation, the Court entered a minute
16
entry noting that the case had been dismissed with prejudice and directing the Clerk to close the
17
file. ECF No. 32.
18
Defendant Cross-Complainant Regents of the University of California (“Defendant”) now
19
asks the Court to clarify that, although the Commission’s First Amended Complaint is dismissed
20
with prejudice, Defendant’s Cross-Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. ECF No. 33.
21
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this Notice is also effective without
22
court order. The Clerk shall close the file.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Dated: February 17, 2015
25
26
27
28

______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge