Duttweiler v. Triumph Motorcycles (America) Ltd.

Filing 24

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. EXTENDING DEADLINES (Re 23 Stipulation). (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

CRAIG R. DUTTWEILER,

Case No. 14-cv-04809-HSG

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES

9
10

TRIUMPH MOTORCYCLES (AMERICA)
LTD.,
Defendant.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Re: Dkt. No. 23

12
13

On February 20, 2015, the parties submitted a stipulation requesting extensions to three

14

deadlines: (1) the plaintiff’s February 19, 2015 deadline to file a First Amended Complaint

15

(“FAC”); (2) the defendant’s deadline to respond to the FAC; and (3) the parties’ March 2, 2015

16

deadline to file a Joint Case Management Statement.

17

The Court notes that plaintiff’s deadline to file a FAC had already passed by the time the

18

parties’ stipulation was filed. It is improper to request an extension after failing to comply with a

19

Court order. The plaintiff does not explain why an extension of time could not have been

20

requested sooner or why the 30 day period afforded the plaintiff to file the FAC was insufficient.

21

In short, the parties have provided no good cause to move the identified deadlines.

22

Notwithstanding this failure, the Court will set the schedule as follows:

23

First, plaintiff will file the FAC no later than March 13, 2015. No further extensions will

24
25
26
27
28

be granted.
Second, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement complying with the
Court's February 13, 2015 reassignment order no later than March 27, 2015.

Third, defendant will file a response to the FAC no later than April 30, 2015.

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5
6

Dated:

2/20/2015
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2