Securities And Exchange Commission v. Sabrdaran et al

Filing 211

WRIT of Garnishment issued (sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 5 Plaintiff, 6 v. Case No. 3:14-cv-4825 (JSC) POST-JUDGMENT CONTINUING WRIT OF GARNISHMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 69 7 SASAN SABRDARAN, et al. 8 Defendants, 9 and 10 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., and its 11 successors or assigns, Garnishee. 12 13 14 TO: Garnishee Bank of America, N.A. 15 REQUESTED BY: 17 United States Securities and Exchange Commission Michael J. Roessner Assistant Chief Litigation Counsel 100 F Street, NE, MS-5631 Washington, DC 20549-0022 18 ISSUED PURSUANT TO: Rule 69 16 19 20 21 22 The Court having reviewed the Plaintiff's Application for Post-Judgment Writ of Garnishment, hereby issues this Post-Judgment Writ of Garnishment. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has information 23 indicating that Garnishee may have possession, custody or control of property in which 24 Defendant has a substantial nonexempt interest. This property may include Defendant's 25 nonexempt disposable earnings (i.e., wages). 26 27 28 Pending further order of this Court, Garnishee is hereby directed to withhold and retain any property in its possession, custody or control in which Defendant has an interest at the time SEC V. SASAN SABRDARAN ET AL CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4825-JSC 1 WRIT OF GARNISHMENT 1 this Writ is served or in which the Defendant may obtain an interest in the future, including 2 Defendant's nonexempt disposable earnings. Garnishee is further directed to file a notice with 3 the Clerk of the Court and copying counsel for the SEC indicating the amount of assets it is 4 retaining pursuant to this Writ of Garnishment. 5 6 7 8 9 If Garnishee fails to withhold property in accordance with this Writ, Garnishee may be held in contempt by the Court or the Court may enter judgment against the Garnishee for the value of Defendant’s nonexempt interest in such property, plus a reasonable attorney's fee to the SEC. 10 This Writ of Garnishment is a continuing writ and it will terminate only by: 11 (A) a court order quashing this Writ of Garnishment; 12 (B) exhaustion of property in the possession, custody, or control of the Garnishee in which the debtor has a substantial nonexempt interest (including nonexempt disposable earnings), unless the garnishee reinstates or re-employs the judgment debtor within 90 days after the judgment debtor's dismissal or resignation; or (C) satisfaction of the debt with respect to which this Writ is issued. 13 14 15 16 17 To assist the Garnishee with its obligations under this Writ, the following information is 18 provided: 19 Defendant’s Name: Sasan Sabrdaran 20 Defendant’s TIN: XXX-XX-2270 22 Defendant’s Last Known Address: San Francisco, California 23 Date of Judgment: June 15, 2017 24 Nature of Judgment: Final Judgment 21 25 26 27 28 Disgorgement Judgment SEC V. SASAN SABRDARAN ET AL CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4825-JSC 2 WRIT OF GARNISHMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Disgorgement $288,968.19 Amount of Post-Judgment Interest on Disgorgement accrued as of 4/25/2024: $25,802.39 Total Payments as of 4/25/2024: $22,200.00 Total Amount Still Owing On the Judgment as of 4/25/2024: $292,570.58 (per diem of $9.24) IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this10th day of , 2024. May 12 13 14 UN IT E S DISTR IC ATE T ST T UR CO 15 D R N IF HE OR NI A N O RT 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DI S T RI T O F C C AL 17 Mark B.Busby S. Campos _____________________________ DEPUTY CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SEC V. SASAN SABRDARAN ET AL CASE NO. 3:14-CV-4825-JSC 3 WRIT OF GARNISHMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?