Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Metrotech Solutions USA Inc. et al
Filing
38
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 37 to Continue Hearing and Briefing Schedule on Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt filed by Adobe Systems Incorporated. Responses due by 8/3/2017. Replies due by 8/10/2017. Motion Hearing reset for 8/24/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/11/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2017)
1
6
JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP
Christopher Q. Pham, SBN: 206697
E-mail: cpham@johnsonpham.com
Nicole L. Drey, SBN: 250235
E-mail: ndrey@johnsonpham.com
Hung Q. Pham, SBN: 276613
E-mail: ppham@johnsonpham.com
6355 Topanga Canyon Boulevard, Suite 326
Woodland Hills, California 91367
Telephone:
(818) 888-7540
Facsimile:
(818) 888-7544
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
11
LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE A. SHOHET, A PROF. CORP.
George A. Shohet, SBN: 112697
E-mail: georgeshohet@gmail.com
9100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 720E
Beverly Hills, California 90212
Telephone:
(310) 452-3176
Facsimile:
(310) 452-2270
12
Attorney for Defendants
2
3
4
5
9
10
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, a
Delaware Corporation,
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
v.
METROTECH SOLUTIONS USA INC., a
Delaware Corporation; 9199-6546 QUEBEC
INC., a Canadian Quebecois Corporation
doing business as METROTECH
SOLUTIONS INC., METROTECH
SOLUTIONS and METROTECH; and DOES
2-10, Inclusive,
Case No.: 3:14-cv-04871-EMC
SECOND STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE HEARING AND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTON
FOR CONTEMPT AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Defendants.
Plaintiff ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED (“Plaintiff”), by and through its counsel
of record, and Defendants METROTECH SOLUTIONS USA INC.; 9199-6546 QUEBEC INC.,
d/b/a METROTECH SOLUTIONS INC., METROTECH SOLUTIONS and METROTECH;
9188-0047 QUEBEC INC. d/b/a UKTECH STORE; and 9199-6587 QUEBEC INC. d/b/a IT
-1SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CONTEMPT HEARING – CASE NO.: 3:14-cv-04871-EMC
1
FACTORY (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate
2
and agree as follows:
3
RECITALS
4
5
On August 20, 2015, the Court entered a PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS
AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
(D.E. 31) (“Injunction”).
6
On June 1, 2017, Plaintiff filed its MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AND SANCTIONS AGAINST THE
7
ENJOINED PARTIES (D.E. 33) (“Motion”), asserting that Defendants violated the Injunction by
8
dealing in Adobe products, specifically through their illegal distribution of unbundled (and in
9
one instance, previously activated) Adobe software products.
10
On June 14, 2017, the Parties filed a STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING AND BRIEFING
11
SCHEDULE
12
allow the Parties time to resolve the issues addressed in the Motion.
13
14
ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR
CONTEMPT (D.E. 35) (“First Stipulation”) in order to
On June 15, 2017, the Court granted the Parties’ First Stipulation and continued the
hearing on the Motion to August 3, 2017, with response dates adjusted accordingly.
15
Thereafter, Defendants produced certain documents to Plaintiff in an effort to resolve
16
Plaintiff’s claims, and the Parties have been working towards resolution of the issues contained
17
in the Motion. The Parties, however, need additional time to pursue such a resolution.
18
AGREEMENT
19
Accordingly, Plaintiff and Defendants hereby stipulate and respectfully request the Court
20
continue the hearing on the Motion to August 24, 2017, or a date thereafter acceptable to the
21
Court.
22
23
Additionally, Plaintiff and Defendants hereby stipulate and respectfully request that
Defendants’ response to the Motion be due on or before August 3, 2017.
24
25
///
26
27
///
28
-2SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CONTEMPT HEARING – CASE NO.: 3:14-cv-04871-EMC
1
2
Plaintiff and Defendants hereby stipulate and respectfully request that Plaintiff’s reply
shall be due on or before August 10, 2017.
3
4
DATED: July 7, 2017
JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP
5
By: /s/ Nicole Drey Huerter
Nicole Drey Huerter, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
6
7
8
DATED: July 7, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE A. SHOHET,
A PROF. CORP.
9
10
By: /s/ George A. Shohet
Pierre Francis
Attorney for Defendants
METROTECH SOLUTIONS USA INC.; 91996546 QUEBEC INC., d/b/a METROTECH
SOLUTIONS INC., METROTECH SOLUTIONS
and METROTECH; 9188-0047 QUEBEC INC.
d/b/a UKTECH STORE; and 9199-6587 QUEBEC
INC. d/b/a IT FACTORY
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
[PROPOSED] ORDER
18
19
Pursuant to Stipulation, the hearing on Plaintiff’s MOTION
FOR
CONTEMPT
AND
20
SANCTIONS AGAINST
21
August 24
____________________, 2017. Defendants’ response to the Motion is due three (3) weeks prior
22
to the hearing date. Plaintiff’s reply to the Motion is due two (2) weeks prior to the hearing date.
ENJOINED PARTIES (“Motion”) is reset from August 3, 2017, to
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
dwa
Judge E
ER
A
H
28
R NIA
27
25
LI
26
UNIT
ED
______________________________
ERED
HON. SO ORDIED M. CHEN
IT IS EDWARD
F
DI
AS States
United MO District Judge
Northern Districthen California
of
rd M. C
NO
July 11, 2017
DATED: ____________________
S
24
FO
23
THE
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
-3SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CONTEMPT HEARING – CASE NO.: 3:14-cv-04871-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?