City of Berkeley et al v. United States Postal Service et al
Filing
20
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION. Signed by Judge Alsup on 11/18/2014. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
CITY OF BERKELEY, and MAYOR
AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BERKELEY,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. C 14-04916 WHA
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
v.
16
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
PATRICK R. DONAHOE, TOM A.
SAMRA, and DIANA ALVARADO,
17
Defendants.
15
/
18
19
The problem with counsel’s proposed stipulation (Dkt. No. 19) rearranging the hearing
20
date is that it will give the judge two days less time to review the record and briefs. Therefore,
21
before acting on the pending request, the judge poses the following questions:
22
(1) Which plaintiffs’ counsel would be attending the Las Vegas event?
23
(2) Why can’t other plaintiffs’ counsel conduct the hearing in our case?
24
Please respond by 12 P.M. TODAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: November 18, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?