City of Berkeley et al v. United States Postal Service et al

Filing 30

ORDER REFERRING CASE FOR DETERMINATION OF RELATED STATUS re 3:14-cv-05179-JST National Trust for Historic Preservation v. United States Postal Service et al. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 26, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION, 8 Plaintiff, 10 11 ORDER REFERRING CASE FOR DETERMINATION OF RELATED STATUS v. 9 Case No. 14-cv-05179-JST UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et al., United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff National Trust for Historic Preservation filed this action on November 24, 2014, 14 seeking declaratory and injunctive relief regarding the proposed sale of the Berkeley Main Post 15 Office to a private party. ECF No. 1. NTHP contends that the sale would violate the National 16 Historic Preservation Act and the National Environmental Policy Act, and seeks an injunction to 17 prevent the sale. Id. 18 The case appears potentially to be related to an earlier case now pending before Judge 19 William Alsup, City of Berkeley v. United States Postal Service, Case No. 3:14-cv-04916-WHA. 20 That case also involves the Berkeley Main Post Office. Plaintiff City of Berkeley makes similar 21 arguments to those made by the NTHP, and seeks similar relief. 22 Accordingly, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the undersigned now refers this case to 23 Judge Alsup to consider whether the cases are related. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 2 3 4 5 order on all parties in both cases. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 26, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?