e.Digital Corporation v. Dropcam, Inc.

Filing 38

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 37 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by e.Digital Corporation filed by e.Digital Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 12, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2015)

Case3:14-cv-04922-JST Document37 Filed01/09/15 Page1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
e.Digital Corporation
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Dropcam Inc.

CASE NO. ______________________
C-14-04922 JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Private mediation to be
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
conducted before an agreed upon mediator after claim construction order is issued.
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9

after claim construction order is issued.
other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________
1/9/2015

____________________________
/s/Pamela C. Chalk
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________
1/9/2015

____________________________
/s/Stefani E. Shanberg
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

Case3:14-cv-04922-JST Document37 Filed01/09/15 Page2 of 2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

DERED
SO OR
__________________________________
IT IS

R NIA

Dated: January 12, 2015

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

XX
9
9

MAGISTRATE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A

H

LI

RT

ER

S . Ti ga r

FO

NO

n
J u d ge J o

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2