Turkalj v. Entra Default Solutions, LLC et al

Filing 20

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; SETTING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS re 19 STIPULATION. Motion Hearing as to 10 MOTION to Dismiss set for 4/8/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco be fore Hon. William H. Orrick. If the parties believe that the motion to dismiss should remain vacated for the time being, they may appear at the previously-scheduled March 24, 2015 case management conference and state their reasons. Otherwise, the Case Management Conference is continued to 6/2/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco (Case Management Statement due by 5/26/2015). Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/18/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

MATIJA TURKALJ,

Case No. 14-cv-04945-WHO

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
11

ENTRA DEFAULT SOLUTIONS, LLC, et
al.,
Defendants.

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED
REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
SETTING HEARING ON MOTION TO
DISMISS

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 19
12
13

Plaintiff Matija Turkalj sued defendants Entra Default Solutions, LLC and BSI Financial

14

Services, Inc. for breach of contract, violations of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair

15

Credit Reporting Act, the California Homeowner’s Bill of Rights, and for fraud. Dkt. No. 1.

16

Turkalj’s complaint arises from the foreclosure on his home after he allegedly defaulted on a loan

17

secured by the property.

18

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on December 18, 2014. Dkt. No. 10. The motion is

19

fully briefed. See Dkt. Nos. 14-15. On January 21, 2015 this matter was referred to the ADR unit

20

and the hearing on the motion to dismiss was vacated so that the parties could attempt settlement.

21

The parties participated in an ADR phone conference on February 26, 2015. No future ADR

22

conferences are currently scheduled.

23

Accordingly, there appears not to be any reason to delay this matter further. The hearing

24

on defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 10) is SET for April 8, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. If the parties

25

believe that the motion to dismiss should remain vacated for the time being, they may appear at

26

the previously-scheduled March 24, 2015 case management conference and state their reasons. If

27

they wish, the parties should contact courtroom deputy Jean Davis at [phone] to make

28

arrangements to appear telephonically. Notice that a party wishes to appear at the case

1

management conference should be provided by March 20, 2015.
The parties have filed a stipulated request to continue the case management conference

2
3

currently set for March 24, 2015 for 60 to 90 days. Dkt. No. 19. Unless the parties want to delay

4

the hearing on the motion to dismiss, their request to continue the case management conference is

5

GRANTED and the case management conference will be CONTINUED until June 2, 2015 at 2:00

6

p.m.

7
8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 18, 2015
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2