Macdonald et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A

Filing 57

SCHEDULING ORDER. Discovery due by 10/28/2016; Motion Hearing set for 1/26/2017 02:00 PM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/18/2017 03:00 PM; Jury Selection / Jury Trial set for 5/1/2017 08:30 AM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. ( 49 STIPULATION To Continue Trial and Trial Related Deadlines DENIED as moot.) Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 9/21/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BRET MACDONALD, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 Re: Dkt. No. 49 WELLS FARGO BANK N.A, Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California SCHEDULING ORDER v. 9 10 Case No.14-cv-04970-HSG 12 On September 19, 2016, the parties filed declarations in support of their stipulated request 13 to continue trial and related case deadlines. Dkt. Nos. 54, 55. Having reviewed the declarations, 14 the Court finds that there is good cause to alter the Court’s April 12, 2016 Scheduling Order, Dkt. 15 No. 47. The Court sets the following deadlines: 16 Litigation Event Court Deadline Close of Fact Discovery October 28, 2016 December 9, 2016 20 Close of Expert Discovery Dispositive Motion Hearing Deadline 21 Pretrial Conference April 18, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. 22 Jury Trial May 1, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. 17 18 19 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // January 26, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. These dates may only be altered by order of the Court and only upon a showing of good 1 2 cause. The Court DENIES the pending Stipulated Request to Continue Deadlines, Dkt. No. 49, as 3 moot. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 9/21/2016 6 7 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?