Juan Saravia v. Dynamex, Inc. et al
Filing
159
NOTICE RE DECERTIFICATION MOTION. Signed by Judge Alsup on 7/20/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JUAN SARAVIA, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. C 14-05003 WHA
v.
15
DYNAMEX, INC., DYNAMEX FLEET
SERVICES, INC., DYNAMEX
OPERATIONS EAST, INC., and
DYNAMEX OPERATIONS WEST, INC.,
16
Defendants.
14
NOTICE RE
DECERTIFICATION MOTION
/
17
18
On the motion to decertify, plaintiffs’ counsel shall set forth in detail in their opposition
19
a plan to try the case on a class-wide basis, including specifically a method of proof to establish
20
liability across the board on a class-wide basis. Put differently, how can we avoid a trial within
21
a trial as to each opt-in’s situation, for example, to find out how many employees work for each
22
opt-in and so forth. Both sides shall further brief (movant on its reply) what would keep, if we
23
did decertify, each opt-in from commencing his own action against Dynamex in this court. Is
24
opting-in equivalent to intervention such that we must keep all of the opt-ins as individual
25
plaintiffs anyway?
26
27
28
Dated: July 19, 2016
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?