Juan Saravia v. Dynamex, Inc. et al

Filing 212

ORDER FOR NON-SUBSTANTIVE MODIFICATION OF ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS CERTAIN OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS by Hon. William Alsup granting 211 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2016)

Download PDF
1 7 ROBERT G. HULTENG, Bar No. 071293 rhulteng@littler.com AURELIO J. PÉREZ, Bar No. 282135 aperez@littler.com LAUREN E. MEYERHOLZ, Bar No. 294518 lmeyerholz@littler.com PERRY K. MISKA, Bar No. 299129 pmiska@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: 415.433.1940 Facsimile: 415.399.8490 8 Attorneys for Defendants 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 TODD M. SCHNEIDER, Bar No. 158253 JOSHUA G. KONECKY, Bar No. 182897 SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP 2000 Powell Street, Suite 1400 Emeryville, California 94608 Telephone: (415) 421-7100 Facsimile: (415) 421-7105 tschneider@schneiderwallace.com jkonecky@schneiderwallace.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 JUAN SARAVIA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 22 23 24 25 26 v. DYNAMEX, INC., DYNAMEX FLEET SERVICES, INC., DYNAMEX OPERATIONS EAST, INC. and DYNAMEX OPERATIONS WEST, INC., Case No. 3:14-CV-05003-WHA JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR NON-SUBSTANTIVE MODIFICATION OF ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS CERTAIN OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS [DKT NO. 206] Complaint Filed: Trial Date: November 12, 2014 January 9, 2017 Defendants. 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 415.433.1940 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING ORDER ON DEFS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS [DKT. NO. 206] 1. Case No. 3:14-cv-05003-WHA 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their 2 respective clients, hereby respectfully submit the following joint stipulation to modify the Court’s 3 Order on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Certain Opt-In Plaintiffs. (Dkt. No. 206.) Specifically, 4 the parties stipulate to conform the spelling of the names of four of the Opt-In Plaintiffs subject to 5 the Order to the spelling of their names on the Opt-In Consent to Join forms previously submitted to 6 the Court. 7 8 The Parties propose the following corrections, and respectfully request that the Court modify the Order accordingly: 9 10 Name in Order Name on Opt-In Consent Form 11 Somching Kapkitkajon (Dkt. No. 206 Somching Lapkitkajon (Dkt. Nos. 115- 12 at 3:7, 8:22) 3 at Exh. 139; 172-2 at 2:11-12, 195 at 13 10:11) 14 Manjit Sing Manjit Singh (Dkt. Nos. 115-3 at Exh. 15 (Dkt. No. 206 at 3:14, 8:24) 146; 172-2 at 2:11-12, 195 at 10:23) 16 Amrit Sing Amrit Pal Singh (Dkt. Nos. 115-3 at 17 (Dkt. No. 206 at 3:13, 8:23) Exh. 141; 172-2 at 2:11-12, 195 at 18 10:18) 19 Jasbir Sing Jasbir Singh (Dkt Nos. 115-3 at Exh. 20 (Dkt. No. 206 at 3:13, 8:23) 142; 172-2 at 2:11-12, 195 at 10:19) 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 // // // // // // // 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 415.433.1940 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING ORDER ON DEFS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS [DKT. NO. 206] 1. Case No. 3:14-cv-05003-WHA 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 3 DATED: October 14, 2016 Respectfully submitted, SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP 4 5 By: /s/ Joshua G. Konecky Joshua G. Konecky 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 9 DATED: October 14, 2016 10 By: /s/ Lauren E. Meyerholz Lauren E. Meyerholz 11 Attorneys for Defendants 12 13 14 15 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. The names used in the order dated September 30, 2016 (Dkt. No. 206) are hereby modified as set forth above. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 October 14, 2016. DATED: _____________________ 18 19 HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 415.433.1940 Firmwide:143240813.5 052385.1038 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING ORDER ON DEFS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS [DKT NO. 206] 2. Case No. 3:14-cv-05003-WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?