Juan Saravia v. Dynamex, Inc. et al

Filing 231

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 230 Motion to Strike.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

JUAN SARAVIA, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16

v.
DYNAMEX, INC., DYNAMEX FLEET
SERVICES, LLC, DYNAMEX
OPERATIONS EAST, INC., and DYNAMEX
OPERATIONS WEST, INC.,

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO STRIKE

Defendants.
/

17
18

No. C 14-05003 WHA

Defendants move to strike the reply declaration of Michael Heart, inasmuch as it

19

includes evidence that could have been raised in plaintiff’s motion. Alternatively, defendants

20

seek leave to file a surreply. Defendants may file a surreply NOT TO EXCEED TEN PAGES

21

addressing only the evidence raised for the first time in Michael Hart’s reply declaration. Any

22

extraneous material will be stricken. Defendants’ surreply is due by 10:00 P.M. ON

23

NOVEMBER 29.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: November 28, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE