Juan Saravia v. Dynamex, Inc. et al

Filing 269

ORDER RE OBJECTION FILED WITH COURT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 2/22/17. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JUAN SARAVIA, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Plaintiff, No. C 14-05003 WHA v. 13 DYNAMEX, INC., et al., 14 Defendant. / 15 16 ORDER RE OBJECTION FILED WITH COURT The Court has read the objection by Brian Barbaro (which should have been sent to the 17 lawyers) (Dkt. No. 268). The Court is understanding of Mr. Barbaro’s desire to be away due to 18 the birth of his child expected to occur that week, but the problem is the phone system in the 19 courtroom is so inadequate that it proves exceedingly difficult to patch people in by phone 20 while everyone else appears in person. The last time the Court attempted this was a nightmare. 21 Accordingly, Mr. Barbaro’s request to appear by telephone is DENIED. Mr. Barbaro may send a 22 lawyer to speak on his behalf. 23 24 With regard to the merits of the objection, the Court will consider fully the letter and hereby requires counsel to respond to the objection in the filings due on March 23. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: February 22, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?