Telecom Asset Management, LLC v. Cellco Partnership et al
Filing
66
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME by Hon. William Alsup denying 64 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2015)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
TELECOM ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC,
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
No. C 14-05021 WHA
v.
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a VERIZON
WIRELESS; VERIZON SOURCING LLC;
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC; and
DOES I through X, inclusive,
ORDER DENYING MOTION
TO ENLARGE TIME
Defendants.
/
12
13
A January 8 order denied without prejudice defendants’ motion to transfer but set an
14
April 30 (at noon), deadline for any renewed motion to transfer. Counsel were to “please
15
cooperate in getting the discovery done well before this deadline (on pain of adverse inferences)”
16
(Dkt. No. 35). At the January 27 hearing, the Court held back from setting specific dates for
17
discovery on the express promise by both sides that they would cooperate in getting the
18
discovery done well in advance of the April deadline (Jan. 27 Hr’g Tr. 36). A January 27 order
19
followed stating that the mediation had to be completed by April 30 (Dkt. No. 44).
20
The mediation is currently scheduled for April 29, according to plaintiff’s counsel.
21
Now, plaintiff’s counsel seek to extend the mediation (and thus the discovery and further
22
case management conference) deadlines by “30-45 days.” For good cause not shown, plaintiff’s
23
motion is DENIED. Both sides shall please review the undersigned judge’s standing order,
24
including the discovery guidelines. Please remember that the parties must promptly meet-and-
25
confer in person or telephonically regarding discovery disputes. If those efforts fail, the parties
26
may file a discovery letter (not to exceed three pages).
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 20, 2015.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?