District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. JMW Carpet and Flooring, Inc. et al
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 17 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Marian Bourboulis, Central Coast Counties Floor Covering Industry Pension Fund, and its Board of Trustees, Chris Christopherson, District Council 16 Northern Ca lifornia Health and Welfare Trust Fund filed by Marian Bourboulis, John Sherak, Chris Christopherson, District Council No. 16 of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman and Appr entice Training Trust Fund and its Joint Board of Trustees, John Maggiore, Central Coast Counties Floor Covering Industry Pension Fund, and its Board of Trustees, District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees, Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund, and its Board of Trustees. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 30, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2015)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
District Council 16 Northern California
Health and Welfare Trust Fund, et al.,
CASE NO. C14-5029 JST
Plaintiff(s),
v.
JMW Carpet and Flooring, Inc., et al.,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
4/28/15
Dated:___________
/S/
____________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff
4/28/15
Dated:____________
/S/
____________________________
Attorney for Defendant
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation."
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
9
Non-binding Arbitration
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
9
Mediation
9
Private ADR
UNIT
ED
R NIA
DERED
SO OR
___________________________________
IT IS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
H
LI
RT
ER
FO
NO
J u d ge J o
JUDGE
ar
n S . Ti g
A
April 30, 2015
Dated:________________
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
Deadline for ADR session
9
90 days from the date of this order.
9
other ___________________
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
1
2
ATTESTATION CERTIFICATE
In accord with the Northern District of California’s General Order No. 45, Section X(B), I
3 attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other
4 signatories who are listed on the signature page.
5
Dated: April 29, 2015
DISTRICT COUNCIL 16 NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND WELFARE
TRUST FUND, et al.
6
7
By:
8
/S/
Michele R. Stafford, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1ATTESTATION CERTIFICATE
Case No.: C14-5029 JST
P:\CLIENTS\FLRCL\JMW Carpet (affiliated with JW Carpet)\Pleadings\attestation certificate.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?