Hunter v. Sokoloff et al
Filing
107
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 104 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE filed by John Douglas Hunter. Close of Fact Discovery due by 8/2/2019. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 1, 2019. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2019)
5
Jennifer Seraphine (SBN 245463)
seraphine@turnerboyd.com
Louis Wai (SBN 295089)
wai@turnerboyd.com
TURNER BOYD LLP
702 Marshall Street, Suite 640
Redwood City, CA 94063
Telephone: 650.521.5930
Facsimile: 650.521.5931
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff John Douglas Hunter
1
2
3
4
Xavier Becerra
Attorney General of California
Marisa Y. Kirschenbauer
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
Jeffrey T. Fisher, State Bar No. 303712
Jeffrey.Fisher@doj.ca.gov
Deputy Attorney General
Heewon Heidi Seo, State Bar No. 302021
Heidi.Seo@doj.ca.gov
Deputy Attorney General
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: (415) 510-3620
Fax: (415) 703-5843
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant Sokoloff
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
JOHN DOUGLAS HUNTER,
15
Case No. 14-CV-05031-JST
Plaintiff,
16
17
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO
SERVE DISCOVERY RELATING TO
AUTHENTICITY AND
ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE
v.
M. SOKOLOFF,
18
Defendant.
Judge:
The Hon. Jon S. Tigar
Trial Date: December 9, 2019
19
20
21
Plaintiff John Douglas Hunter and Defendant M. Sokoloff have stipulated to extend the close
22
of fact discovery deadline from the current deadline of June 7, 2019 to August 2, 2019 (same day as
23
expert discovery cut-off), solely for discovery relating to authenticity and admissibility of the
24
evidence in this case (including, for example, discovery relating to custodians and business records,
25
discovery relating to authenticity, discovery related to source and chain of custody of produced
26
documents and things). This extension does not apply to other discovery not relating to authenticity
27
and admissibility of the evidence in this case.
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE
TO SERVE DISCOVERY RE
AUTHENTICITY AND ADMISSIBILITY
1
CASE NO. 14-CV-05031-JST
This extension allows the parties the necessary time to meet and confer about stipulating to
1
2
the authenticity and admissibility of evidence in this case, thereby avoiding or reducing discovery on
3
non-parties, including, for example, custodians of records at the CDCR.
4
5
Dated:
April 29, 2019
10
/s/ Louis Wai
Jennifer Seraphine (SBN 245463)
seraphine@turnerboyd.com
Louis Wai (SBN 295089)
wai@turnerboyd.com
TURNER BOYD LLP
702 Marshall Street, Suite 640
Redwood City, CA 94063
Telephone: 650.521.5930
Facsimile: 650.521.5931
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff John Douglas Hunter
6
7
8
9
12
13
14
Dated:
April 29, 2019
/s/ Heidi Seo
15
Xavier Becerra
Attorney General of California
Marisa Y. Kirschenbauer
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
Jeffrey T. Fisher, State Bar No. 303712
Jeffrey.fisher@doj.ca.gov
Deputy Attorney General
Heewon Heidi Seo, State Bar No. 302021
Heidi.Seo@doj.ca.gov
Deputy Attorney General
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: (415) 510-3620
Fax: (415) 703-5843
16
17
18
26
ER
R NIA
FO
. Ti ga r
Attorneys for Defendant Sokoloff
LI
nS
J u d ge J o
H
25
RT
24
NO
23
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
A
22
UNIT
ED
21
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
20
S
19
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
Dated: May 1, 2019
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO
SERVE DISCOVERY RE AUTHENTICITY
AND ADMISSIBILITY
2
CASE NO. 14-CV-05031-JST
ATTESTATION
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the undersigned filer of this document certifies that
2
3
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
4
5
/s/Louis Wai
6
7
8
9
SO ORDERED.
10
11
Dated:
12
_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO
SERVE DISCOVERY RE AUTHENTICITY
AND ADMISSIBILITY
3
CASE NO. 14-CV-05031-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?