Hunter v. Sokoloff et al

Filing 107

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 104 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE filed by John Douglas Hunter. Close of Fact Discovery due by 8/2/2019. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 1, 2019. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2019)

Download PDF
5 Jennifer Seraphine (SBN 245463) seraphine@turnerboyd.com Louis Wai (SBN 295089) wai@turnerboyd.com TURNER BOYD LLP 702 Marshall Street, Suite 640 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: 650.521.5930 Facsimile: 650.521.5931 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff John Douglas Hunter 1 2 3 4 Xavier Becerra Attorney General of California Marisa Y. Kirschenbauer Supervising Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey T. Fisher, State Bar No. 303712 Jeffrey.Fisher@doj.ca.gov Deputy Attorney General Heewon Heidi Seo, State Bar No. 302021 Heidi.Seo@doj.ca.gov Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 510-3620 Fax: (415) 703-5843 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant Sokoloff 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 JOHN DOUGLAS HUNTER, 15 Case No. 14-CV-05031-JST Plaintiff, 16 17 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SERVE DISCOVERY RELATING TO AUTHENTICITY AND ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE v. M. SOKOLOFF, 18 Defendant. Judge: The Hon. Jon S. Tigar Trial Date: December 9, 2019 19 20 21 Plaintiff John Douglas Hunter and Defendant M. Sokoloff have stipulated to extend the close 22 of fact discovery deadline from the current deadline of June 7, 2019 to August 2, 2019 (same day as 23 expert discovery cut-off), solely for discovery relating to authenticity and admissibility of the 24 evidence in this case (including, for example, discovery relating to custodians and business records, 25 discovery relating to authenticity, discovery related to source and chain of custody of produced 26 documents and things). This extension does not apply to other discovery not relating to authenticity 27 and admissibility of the evidence in this case. 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SERVE DISCOVERY RE AUTHENTICITY AND ADMISSIBILITY 1 CASE NO. 14-CV-05031-JST This extension allows the parties the necessary time to meet and confer about stipulating to 1 2 the authenticity and admissibility of evidence in this case, thereby avoiding or reducing discovery on 3 non-parties, including, for example, custodians of records at the CDCR. 4 5 Dated: April 29, 2019 10 /s/ Louis Wai Jennifer Seraphine (SBN 245463) seraphine@turnerboyd.com Louis Wai (SBN 295089) wai@turnerboyd.com TURNER BOYD LLP 702 Marshall Street, Suite 640 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: 650.521.5930 Facsimile: 650.521.5931 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff John Douglas Hunter 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 Dated: April 29, 2019 /s/ Heidi Seo 15 Xavier Becerra Attorney General of California Marisa Y. Kirschenbauer Supervising Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey T. Fisher, State Bar No. 303712 Jeffrey.fisher@doj.ca.gov Deputy Attorney General Heewon Heidi Seo, State Bar No. 302021 Heidi.Seo@doj.ca.gov Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 510-3620 Fax: (415) 703-5843 16 17 18 26 ER R NIA FO . Ti ga r Attorneys for Defendant Sokoloff LI nS J u d ge J o H 25 RT 24 NO 23 ERED O ORD IT IS S A 22 UNIT ED 21 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 20 S 19 N D IS T IC T R OF C Dated: May 1, 2019 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SERVE DISCOVERY RE AUTHENTICITY AND ADMISSIBILITY 2 CASE NO. 14-CV-05031-JST ATTESTATION 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the undersigned filer of this document certifies that 2 3 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 4 5 /s/Louis Wai 6 7 8 9 SO ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: 12 _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SERVE DISCOVERY RE AUTHENTICITY AND ADMISSIBILITY 3 CASE NO. 14-CV-05031-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?