Novitaz, Inc. v. Shopkick, Inc.

Filing 150

ORDER TO MODIFY CASE SCHEULE granting 147 Stipulation. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/28/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

DIANA RUTOWSKI (CA Bar No. 233878)
[e-mail]
GEORGE KANABE (CA Bar No. 284779)
[e-mail]
ANDREW S. ONG (CA Bar No. 267889)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant,
SHOPKICK, INC.

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13

NOVITAZ, INC.,

14
15
16
17

Case No. 3:14-cv-05077 WHO
Plaintiff,

v.

STIPULATION PURSUANT TO L.R.
6-1(B) AND ORDER TO
MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE

SHOPKICK, INC.,
Defendant.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05077 WHO

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff Novitaz, Inc. and Defendant shopkick, Inc., by

2

and through the undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to the following proposed

3

modifications to the current Case Schedule (see Dkt. No. 145):

4

Event
Patent L.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction
and Prehearing Statement
Patent L.R. 4-4 Close of Claim
Construction Discovery

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[other than claim construction
depositions listed below]
Patent L.R. 4-5(a) Opening Claim
Construction Brief
Deadline for shopkick to conduct claim
construction deposition of Jayant
Ramchandani
Patent L.R. 4-5(b) Responsive Claim
Construction Brief
Deadline for Novitaz to conduct claim
construction depositions of Walter
Overby and Marc Prioleau
Patent L.R. 4-5(c) Reply Claim
Construction Brief
Claim Construction Tutorial

Current Date
September 24, 2015

Modified Date
[unchanged]

October 8, 2015

[unchanged]

October 29, 2015

[unchanged]

[none]

November 12, 2015

December 7, 2015

[unchanged]

[none]

December 14, 2015

December 21, 2015

[unchanged]

January 22, 2016 at 10
a.m. in Courtroom 12
Claim Construction Hearing
January 29, 2016 at 10
a.m. in Courtroom 12
Fact discovery cut-off
90 days after issuance of
claim construction ruling
Initial expert disclosures/reports (on issue 120 days after issuance
where the party bears the burden of
of claim construction
proof)
ruling
Rebuttal expert reports
165 days after issuance
of claim construction
ruling
Close of expert discovery
195 days after issuance
of claim construction
ruling
Deadline for dispositive motions
225 days after issuance
of claim construction
ruling
Hearing on dispositive motions
Subject to the Court’s
convenience, ten months
after issuance of claim
construction ruling
Final pretrial conference
Subject to the Court’s
convenience, twelve
months after issuance of
claim construction ruling
Trial
Subject to the Court’s
convenience, thirteen
-2-

[unchanged]
[unchanged]
[unchanged]
[unchanged]
[unchanged]
[unchanged]
[unchanged]
[unchanged]

[unchanged]

[unchanged]
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05077 WHO

1

Event

Current Date
months after issuance of
claim construction ruling

2
3
4
5
6
7

Modified Date

The proposed modifications merely extend the Patent Local Rule 4-4 claim construction
discovery deadline with respect to three claim construction depositions.
This modification of the schedule will not alter any other dates currently set by the Court’s
case scheduling order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

8
9

Dated: September 24, 2015

10
11

GRAY ROBINSON, P.A.
GATTEY LAW OFFICE

By:

12

Attorney for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
NOVITAZ, INC.

13
14
15

/s/ Woodrow H. Pollack
WOODROW H. POLLACK

Dated: September 24, 2015

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

16
By:

17
18

Attorney for Defendant and Counterclaimant
SHOPKICK, INC.

19
20
21
22

/s/ Diana Rutowski
DIANA RUTOWSKI

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September __, 2015
28
Honorable William H. Orrick
United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05077 WHO