SONG FI, INC. v. GOOGLE, INC. et al

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER RENOTICING HEARING AND EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE as to 26 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities. Responses due by 2/2/2015. Replies due by 3/4/2015. Motion Hearing set for 3/20/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 01/06/2015. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452
JACOB VELTMAN, State Bar No. 247597
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11

SONG FI, INC., et al.,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiffs,
v.
GOOGLE INC. and YOUTUBE, LLC,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION RE MOTION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05080-SC

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:14-cv-05080-SC
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER RENOTICING HEARING
AND EXTENDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
Before: Hon. Samuel Conti

1
2

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Song fi, Inc. filed its original Complaint in this action against
Defendants on July 28, 2014;

3

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on August 15, 2014;

4

WHEREAS, Judge Rosemary Collyer of the U.S. District Court for the District of

5

Columbia ordered this action to be transferred to this Court on October 29, 2014 and dismissed

6

Defendants’ then-pending Motion to Dismiss as moot;

7

WHEREAS, Defendants filed a renewed Motion to Dismiss in this Court on December

8

23, 2014 and noticed the motion to be heard on February 20, 2015 pursuant to Section 3 of the

9

Court’s Standing Civil Order;

10

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Defendants’

11

Reply are currently due to be filed on January 6 and January 13, 2015, respectively, pursuant to

12

Civil Local Rule 7-3;

13

WHEREAS, given the holidays, Plaintiffs have requested additional time to respond to

14

Defendants’ motion for the reasons more fully explained in the Declaration of Ronald F. Wick

15

submitted herewith;

16
17

WHEREAS, there have been no prior extensions sought or granted with respect to this
matter;

18

THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, as follows:

19

STIPULATION

20
21

1.

Dismiss shall be extended to February 2, 2015.

22
23

2.

The deadline for Defendants to file their Reply in Support of their Motion to

Dismiss shall be extended to March 4, 2015.

24
25

The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to

3.

The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be continued to March 20,

2015.

26
27
28
STIPULATION RE MOTION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05080-SC

-1-

1

DATED: January 5, 2015

2
3

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
By: /s/ Jacob Veltman
Jacob Veltman

4

Attorneys for Defendants

5
6
7

DATED: January 5, 2015

COZEN O’CONNOR LLP

8
9

By: /s/ Erik L. Jackson
Erik L. Jackson

10

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

11
12
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

15
01/06/2015

17

el Conti

NO

18

amu
Judge S

RT

19

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION RE MOTION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05080-SC

-2-

A

H

ER

20

R NIA

Honorable Samuel Conti
United States District Judge

FO

16

DATED:

RT
U
O

S

14

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

LI

13

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

1
2

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1
I, Jacob Veltman, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to

3

file this document. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that all signatories

4

have concurred in this filing.

5
6

DATED: January 5, 2015

7
8

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
By: /s/ Jacob Veltman
Jacob Veltman

9
10

Attorneys for Defendants

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION RE MOTION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05080-SC

-3-