SONG FI, INC. v. GOOGLE, INC. et al

Filing 36

STIPULATION AND ORDER Rescheduling Hearing and Extending Briefing Schedule re Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. As to 32 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment: Responses due by 3/18/2015, and Replies due by 4/20/2015. Motion Hearings reset for 5/1/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 02/12/2015. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452 JACOB VELTMAN, State Bar No. 247597 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Email: dkramer@wsgr.com Email: jveltman@wsgr.com Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 SONG FI, INC., et al., 12 13 14 15 Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC. and YOUTUBE, LLC, Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. RE MOT. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05080-SC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:14-cv-05080-SC STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RENOTICING HEARING AND EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Before: Hon. Samuel Conti 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS, Defendants filed a renewed Motion to Dismiss in this Court on December 23, 2014 and noticed the motion to be heard on February 20, 2015; WHEREAS, on January 16, 2015, the Court granted the parties’ stipulated request to continue the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss to March 20, 2015; WHEREAS, on February 2, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and noticed it for hearing on March 20, 2015; WHEREAS, Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 8 and Plaintiffs’ Reply are currently due to be filed on February 17, 2015 and February 24, 2015, 9 respectively, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3; 10 WHEREAS, Defendants seek to extend their time to respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for 11 Partial Summary Judgment for the reasons more fully explained in the Declaration of Jacob T. 12 Veltman submitted herewith; 13 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have requested that the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss be 14 continued concomitantly with any continuance of the hearing on the Motion for Partial Summary 15 Judgment; 16 17 18 WHEREAS, there have been no prior extensions sought or granted with respect to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment; THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, as follows: 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 STIPULATION 1. The deadline for Defendants to file their Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment shall be extended to March 18, 2015. 2. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Reply in Support of their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment shall be extended to April 20, 2015. 3. The hearings on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment shall be continued to May 1, 2015. 26 27 28 STIP. RE MOT. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05080-SC -1- 1 2 DATED: February 11, 2015 3 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 4 5 By: /s/ Jacob Veltman Jacob Veltman 6 Attorneys for Defendants 7 8 DATED: February 11, 2015 COZEN O’CONNOR LLP 9 10 By: /s/ Erik L. Jackson Erik L. Jackson 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 12 13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. S DATED: UNIT ED 17 02/12/2015 Honorable Samuel Conti United States District Judge 18 19 ti uel Con NO 20 RT U O 16 S DISTRICT TE C TA am Judge S 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. RE MOT. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05080-SC -2- A H ER LI RT 21 R NIA 15 FO 14 N F D IS T IC T O R C 1 2 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1 I, Jacob Veltman, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 3 file this document. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that all signatories 4 have concurred in this filing. 5 6 DATED: February 11, 2015 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 7 8 By: /s/ Jacob Veltman Jacob Veltman 9 10 Attorneys for Defendants 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. RE MOT. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05080-SC -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?