SONG FI, INC. v. GOOGLE, INC. et al

Filing 56

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Briefing Schedule and Continuing Hearing as to 54 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint and Vacating Case Management Conference. Responses due by 8/14/2015. Replies due by 9/4/2015. Motion Hearing set for 9/11/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 07/24/2015. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2015)

5

DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452
JACOB VELTMAN, State Bar No. 247597
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Defendants

1
2
3
4

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11

SONG FI, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14
15

v.
GOOGLE INC. and YOUTUBE, LLC,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. RE MOT. TO AMEND AND CMC
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05080-SC

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:14-cv-05080-SC
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING
HEARING RE PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO AMEND AND CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Before: Hon. Samuel Conti

1

WHEREAS, a case management conference is currently set for August 14, 2015;

2

WHEREAS, on July 10, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to File a Second

3

Amended Complaint (“Motion to Amend”) and noticed it for hearing on August 14, 2015;

4

WHEREAS, Defendants’ Opposition to the Motion to Amend and Plaintiffs’ Reply are

5

currently due to be filed on July 24, 2015 and July 31, 2015, respectively, pursuant to Civil Local

6

Rule 7-3;

7

WHEREAS, Defendants seek to extend their time to respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion to

8

Amend for the reasons more fully explained in the Declaration of Jacob T. Veltman submitted

9

herewith, and Plaintiffs have requested a corresponding extension of their time to file a Reply;

10

WHEREAS, a continuance of the hearing on the Motion to Amend will be necessary to

11
12
13
14

accommodate the briefing schedule requested by the parties;
WHEREAS, the parties believe it would not be productive to hold a case management
conference until the pleadings are resolved;
THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the Court’s approval, as follows:

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

STIPULATION
1.

The deadline for Defendants to file their Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend

shall be extended to August 14, 2015.
2.

The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Reply in Support of their Motion to Amend

shall be extended to September 4, 2015.
3.

The hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend shall be continued to September 11,

2015 at 10:00 a.m.
4.

The case management conference currently set for August 14, 2015 is vacated. In

23

the event that Plaintiffs’ Proposed Second Amended Complaint survives the motion to dismiss

24

stage, the Court will schedule a new case management conference at that time.

25
26
27
28
STIP. RE MOT. TO AMEND AND CMC
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05080-SC

-1-

1

DATED: July 23, 2015

2
3

By: /s/ Jacob Veltman
Jacob Veltman

4

Attorneys for Defendants

5
6

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation

DATED: July 23, 2015

COZEN O’CONNOR LLP

7
8

By: /s/ Ronald F. Wick
Ronald F. Wick

9

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

10
11

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

DATED:

07/24/2015
Honorable Samuel Conti
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. RE MOT. TO AMEND AND CMC
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05080-SC

-2-