Haupt v. Plum District, Inc.

Filing 8

ORDER Dismissing Entire Action with Prejudice re 7 Plaintiff's Request for Dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 1/6/2015. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 R. Rex Parris, Esq. (SBN 96567) rrparris@rrexparris.com Alexander R. Wheeler, Esq. (SBN 239541) awheeler@rrexparris.com Kitty K. Szeto (SBN 258136) kszeto@rrexparris.com R. REX PARRIS LAW FIRM 43364 10th Street West Lancaster, California 93534 Telephone: (661) 949-2595 Facsimile: (661) 949-7524 Kevin I. Shenkman, Esq. (SBN 223315) kshenkman@shenkmanhughes.com SHENKMAN & HUGHES 28905 Wight Rd. Malibu, California 90265 Telephone: (310) 457-0970 Attorneys for Plaintiff 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 MARSHA HAUPT, 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, v. PLUM DISTRICT, INC., a Delaware corporation; and Does 1 through 100, inclusive, 20 21 22 23 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:14-cv-05084-LB [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [Filed Together With Plaintiff’s Request for Dismissal] 24 25 26 27 28 ____________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 Based on Plaintiff Marsha Haupt’s (“Plaintiff”) Request for Dismissal and for good cause shown, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 4 1. This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice against all defendants. 5 2. Each party shall bear her/its own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in 6 7 connection with this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 11 12 DATED: ____________________ January 6, 2015 _________________________________ Honorable Laurel Beeler United States District Court 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ____________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?