Haupt v. Plum District, Inc.
Filing
8
ORDER Dismissing Entire Action with Prejudice re 7 Plaintiff's Request for Dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 1/6/2015. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
R. Rex Parris, Esq. (SBN 96567)
rrparris@rrexparris.com
Alexander R. Wheeler, Esq. (SBN 239541)
awheeler@rrexparris.com
Kitty K. Szeto (SBN 258136)
kszeto@rrexparris.com
R. REX PARRIS LAW FIRM
43364 10th Street West
Lancaster, California 93534
Telephone: (661) 949-2595
Facsimile: (661) 949-7524
Kevin I. Shenkman, Esq. (SBN 223315)
kshenkman@shenkmanhughes.com
SHENKMAN & HUGHES
28905 Wight Rd.
Malibu, California 90265
Telephone: (310) 457-0970
Attorneys for Plaintiff
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
MARSHA HAUPT,
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
v.
PLUM DISTRICT, INC., a Delaware
corporation; and Does 1 through 100,
inclusive,
20
21
22
23
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:14-cv-05084-LB
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
[Filed Together With Plaintiff’s
Request for Dismissal]
24
25
26
27
28
____________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1
2
Based on Plaintiff Marsha Haupt’s (“Plaintiff”) Request for Dismissal and for good
cause shown,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
4
1.
This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice against all defendants.
5
2.
Each party shall bear her/its own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in
6
7
connection with this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
11
12
DATED: ____________________
January 6, 2015
_________________________________
Honorable Laurel Beeler
United States District Court
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
____________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?