Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC et al v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
112
AMENDED ORDER FOLLOWING HEARING ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE amending 111 Order on Discovery Letter Brief (formatting). Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/26/15. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
REMBRANDT PATENT INNOVATIONS
LLC, REMBRANDT SECURE
COMPUTING, LP,
12
13
Plaintiffs,
v.
APPLE INC.,
14
17
18
/
As discussed at the hearing on the parties’ discovery dispute, this order sets the
following schedule in order to tee up the issues with a sworn evidentiary record:
•
By NOVEMBER 25, Rembrandt shall serve on Apple a sworn
statement justifying its assertion of privilege for each document in
dispute, one-by-one.
•
Apple shall have the opportunity to conduct discovery on
Rembrandt’s assertions of privilege. Such discovery must be
completed by DECEMBER 30.
•
By JANUARY 6, 2016, Apple shall file a motion to compel the
production of any documents it believes have been improperly
withheld. Rembrandt’s response brief shall be due on JANUARY 20.
•
A hearing is hereby scheduled for JANUARY 27 AT 9:00 A.M.
19
20
21
22
23
24
AMENDED ORDER
FOLLOWING HEARING ON
DISCOVERY DISPUTE
Defendant.
15
16
No. C 14-05094 WHA (lead)
No. C 14-05093 WHA (consolidated)
25
The parties should meet and confer again to try to narrow the issues, but should abide by the
26
above schedule regardless.
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 26, 2015.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?