Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC et al v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 112

AMENDED ORDER FOLLOWING HEARING ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE amending 111 Order on Discovery Letter Brief (formatting). Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/26/15. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 REMBRANDT PATENT INNOVATIONS LLC, REMBRANDT SECURE COMPUTING, LP, 12 13 Plaintiffs, v. APPLE INC., 14 17 18 / As discussed at the hearing on the parties’ discovery dispute, this order sets the following schedule in order to tee up the issues with a sworn evidentiary record: • By NOVEMBER 25, Rembrandt shall serve on Apple a sworn statement justifying its assertion of privilege for each document in dispute, one-by-one. • Apple shall have the opportunity to conduct discovery on Rembrandt’s assertions of privilege. Such discovery must be completed by DECEMBER 30. • By JANUARY 6, 2016, Apple shall file a motion to compel the production of any documents it believes have been improperly withheld. Rembrandt’s response brief shall be due on JANUARY 20. • A hearing is hereby scheduled for JANUARY 27 AT 9:00 A.M. 19 20 21 22 23 24 AMENDED ORDER FOLLOWING HEARING ON DISCOVERY DISPUTE Defendant. 15 16 No. C 14-05094 WHA (lead) No. C 14-05093 WHA (consolidated) 25 The parties should meet and confer again to try to narrow the issues, but should abide by the 26 above schedule regardless. 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 26, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?