Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC et al v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
96
ORDER GRANTING SEALING MOTION by Hon. William Alsup granting 92 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(whalc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
REMBRANDT PATENT INNOVATIONS
LLC, and REMBRANDT SECURE
COMPUTING, LP,
12
13
14
15
16
No. C 14-05094 WHA (Lead)
Plaintiffs,
No. C 14-05094 WHA (Consolidated)
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING SEALING
MOTION (DKT. NO. 92)
v.
APPLE INC.,
/
17
Plaintiffs filed an administrative motion for leave to file under seal Exhibit 16 and
18
portions of Exhibits 14 and 15 submitted in support of their motion to amend their infringement
19
contentions (Dkt. No. 92). The parties that designated those materials confidential have not filed
20
supporting declarations as required by Local Rule 79-5(e)(1). Nevertheless, the Court has
21
previously granted a request to seal the same materials (except for the instant amendments) for
22
which Apple did submit a supporting declaration in which it asserted these materials are trade
23
secret information about Apple’s source code and hardware (Dkt. Nos. 75, 79).
24
25
26
27
28
1
Good cause shown, plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file under seal is GRANTED. The
2
parties are warned that future sealing motions that are not accompanied with timely supporting
3
declarations will be denied in their entirety.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: August 17, 2015.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?