Razzak v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Filing
50
ORDER vacating the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 40 by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
YASMIN RAZZAK,
Case No. 14-cv-05137-EDL
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION
TO DISMISS
9
10
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Re: Dkt. No. 40
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
13
The Court hereby vacates the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, therefore, no
14
appearances are required. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is submitted for decision and the parties
15
will be served with the Court's order deciding the motion.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 11, 2015
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
________________________
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
YASMIN RAZZAK,
Case No. 14-cv-05137-EDL
Plaintiff,
8
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
9
10
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
14
15
16
17
18
That on June 11, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached order, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
19
20
21
22
Yasmin Razzak
585 Cordova Street
San Francisco, CA 94112
Dated: June 11, 2015
23
24
25
Richard W. Wieking
Clerk, United States District Court
26
27
28
By:________________________
Stephen Ybarra, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?