Razzak v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Filing 50

ORDER vacating the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 40 by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 YASMIN RAZZAK, Case No. 14-cv-05137-EDL Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 9 10 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Re: Dkt. No. 40 Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 13 The Court hereby vacates the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, therefore, no 14 appearances are required. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is submitted for decision and the parties 15 will be served with the Court's order deciding the motion. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 11, 2015 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________ ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 YASMIN RAZZAK, Case No. 14-cv-05137-EDL Plaintiff, 8 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 9 10 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. 14 15 16 17 18 That on June 11, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached order, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 19 20 21 22 Yasmin Razzak 585 Cordova Street San Francisco, CA 94112 Dated: June 11, 2015 23 24 25 Richard W. Wieking Clerk, United States District Court 26 27 28 By:________________________ Stephen Ybarra, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?