Barajas et al v. City of Rhonert Park

Filing 20

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 19 Stipulation Extending ADR Conference Deadline. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2015)

1
2
3
4

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490)
[e-mail]
ANTONIO L. INGRAM II (CA SBN 300528)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]

5
6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
RAUL BARAJAS
ELVA BARAJAS

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12

RAUL BARAJAS and
ELVA BARAJAS

13
Plaintiffs,
14

Case No. 3:14-cv-05157 MEJ
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING EXTENDING
ADR CONFERENCE DEADLINE

v.
15
16
17

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK, a municipal
corporation; and Jacy Tatum, David Rodriquez
and Matthew Snodgrass, officers with the City of
Rohnert Park Police Department,

18

Complaint filed: November 21, 2014
Defendants.

19
20
21

Plaintiffs Raul Barajas and Elva Barajas (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants City of Rohnert
Park, Jacy Tatum, David Rodriquez and Matthew Snodgrass (“Defendants”), through their
undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

22
23

WHEREAS, the Court-appointed mediator, William Herbert sent a correspondence on
March 25, 2015 stating that the target date to complete mediation was May 22, 2015;

24
25
26
27

WHEREAS, on April 8, 2015, Plaintiffs and Defendants discussed mediation with Mr.
Hebert;
WHEREAS, Defendants indicated during that telephone conference that it was going to
file a motion for summary judgement;

28
STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENDING ADR CONFERENCE DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:14-cv-05157 MEJ
sf-3549746

1

1
2
3
4
5

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants agreed that it would not be fruitful to have a
mediation conference before the court’s ruling on the pending summary judgement motion; and
WHEREAS, the parties agree that the ADR deadline should be extended to 45 (forty-five)
days after the Court rules on Defendants’ motion for summary judgement;
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, subject to the approval of the Court, that the

6

ADR deadline will be 45 (forty-five) days after the Court rules on Defendants’ motion for

7

summary judgement.

8
9

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: June 25, 2015

10

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ
ANTONIO L. INGRAM II
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

11
12

By: /s/ Arturo J. González
ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ

13

Attorney for Raul Barajas and Elva Barajas

14
15

Dated: June 25, 2015
SCOTT LEWIS
DAVID F. BEACH
PERRY, JOHNSON, ANDERSON, MILLER &
MOSKOWITZ LLP

16
17
18
19

By: /s/ Scott Lewis
SCOTT LEWIS

20

Attorney for City of Rohnert Park

21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27

June 25, 2015
Dated: __________________, 2015 __________________________________
Hon. Maria-Elena James

28
STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENDING ADR CONFERENCE DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:14-cv-05157 MEJ
sf-3549746

2