Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
232
STIPULATION AND ORDER of dismissal re 228 as to Hirease only filed by Hirease, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/1/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO
Laura L. Ho (SBN 173179)
lho@gbdhlegal.com
Andrew P. Lee (SBN 245903)
alee@gbdhlegal.com
William C. Jhaveri-Weeks (SBN 289984)
wjhaveriweeks@gbdhlegal.com
300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: (510) 763-9800
Fax: (510) 835-1417
LAWYERS’ COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS
OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA
Elisa Della-Piana (SBN 226462)
edellapiana@lccr.com
131 Steuart Street, Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: (415) 543-9444
Fax: (415) 543-0296
AHDOOT & WOLFSON, P.C.
Tina Wolfson (SBN 174806)
twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com
Robert Ahdoot (SBN 172098)
rahdoot@ahdootwolfson.com
Theodore W. Maya (SBN 223242)
tmaya@ahdootwolfson.com
Bradley K. King (SBN 274399)
bking@ahdootwolfson.com
1016 Palm Avenue
West Hollywood, CA 90069
Tel: (310) 474-9111
Fax: (310) 474-8585
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
[Additional counsel listed on following page]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
Case No. 3:14-CV-05200- EMC
17
IN RE UBER FCRA LITIGATION
18
19
20
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Judge:
Hon. Edward M. Chen
Date Action Filed: November 24, 2014
Trial Date: None Set
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05200-EMC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Pamela Q. Devata (Admitted pro hac vice)
pdevata@seyfarth.com
233 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 8000
Chicago, Illinois 60606-6448
Tel: 312.460.5000
Fax: 312.460.7000
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Timothy L. Hix (SBN 184372)
thix@seyfarth.com
333 South Hope Street, Suite 3900
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Tel: 213.270.9600
Fax: 213.270.9601
13
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Nicole Baarts (SBN 226733)
nbaarts@seyfarth.com
Selyn Hong (SBN 303398)
shong@seyfarth.com
560 Mission Street, Suite 3100
San Francisco, California 94105
Tel: 415.397.2823
Fax: 415.397.8549
14
Attorneys for Defendant HIREASE, LLC
10
11
12
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05200-EMC
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Ronald Gillette, Abdul Kadir
2
Mohamed, Shannon Wise, Brandon Farmer, and Meghan Christenson (“Plaintiffs”), on the one hand,
3
and Defendant Hirease, LLC (“Hirease”), on the other, by and through their respective counsel, that
4
Plaintiffs’ individual claims against Hirease in the above-captioned action are dismissed with
5
prejudice, and Plaintiffs’ putative class claims are dismissed without prejudice. Each of the individual
6
plaintiffs and Hirease is to bear his or her own costs and attorneys’ fees, except as separately agreed
7
upon in the individual settlement agreements the Parties have entered.
8
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: May 30, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
10
GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO
11
12
By: /s/ Laura L. Ho
Laura L. Ho
Andrew P. Lee
13
14
AHDOOT & WOLFSON, p.C.
Tina Wolfson
Robert Ahdoot
Theodore W. Maya
Bradley K. King
1016 Palm Avenue
West Hollywood, CA 90069
Tel: (310) 474-9111
Fax: (310) 474-8585
15
16
17
18
19
20
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Class
DATED: May 30, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
21
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
22
23
By: /s/ Pamela Q. Devata
Pamela Q. Devata
Timothy L. Hix
Nicole Bolson Baarts
Selyn Hong
24
25
26
Attorneys for Defendant
HIREASE, LLC
27
28
1
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05200-EMC
1
2
3
4
5
6
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)
I, Selyn Hong, attest that concurrence in the filing of this stipulation has been obtained from
the signatories Laura L. Ho, counsel for Plaintiffs, and Pamela Q. Devata, counsel for Hirease.
Executed this 30th day of May 2017 in San Francisco, California.
By: /s/ Selyn Hong
Selyn Hong
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05200-EMC
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Plaintiffs’ individual claims against Hirease are
3
dismissed with prejudice and Plaintiffs’ putative class claims are dismissed without prejudice. Each
4
of the individual plaintiffs and Hirease is to bear his or her own costs and attorneys’ fees, except as
5
separately agreed upon in the individual settlement agreements the Parties have entered.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ER
14
R NIA
FO
dwar
Judge E
H
13
RT
12
en
d M. Ch
NO
11
______________________________________
D
HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
RDERE
United O O District Judge
IS SStates
IT
LI
10
UNIT
ED
9
6/1/17
DATED: _____________________
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
8
S
7
A
6
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER / CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05200-EMC
39271299v.2
38969365v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?