Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
24
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 Stipulation filed by Hirease, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/27/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2015)
1
2
3
TINA WOLFSON, SBN 174806
twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com
twolfson@andootwolfson.com
AHDOOT & WOLFSON, P.C.
1016 Palm Ave.
West Hollywood, California 90069
Tel: 310-474-9111; Fax: 310-474-8585
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ABDUL KADIR MOHAMED
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Pamela Q. Devata
pdevata@seyfarth.com
131 South Dearborn Street, Suite 2400
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Telephone:
(312) 460-5000
(312) 460-7000
Facsimile:
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Timothy L. Hix (SBN 184372)
thix@seyfarth.com
333 S. Hope Street, Suite 3900
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone:
(213) 270-9600
(213) 270-9601
Facsimile:
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Sarah K. Hamilton (SBN 238819)
shamilton@seyfarth.com
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
(415) 397-2823
(415) 397-8549
Facsimile:
Attorneys for Defendant
HIREASE, LLC
19
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
21
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
22
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
23
24
25
ABDUL KADIR MOHAMED, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
26
27
Case No. 3:14-CV-05200-MEJ
EMC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE
FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff,
v.
Judge:
28
Maria-Elena James
1
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05200-MEJ
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
18891677v.1
1
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; RASIER, LLC;
HIREASE, LLC; and DOES 1-50,
Date Action Filed: November 24, 2014
Action Filed: November
2
Defendants.
3
4
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 and Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Abdul Kadir
5
Mohamed (“Plaintiff”)and Defendant Hirease, LLC ("Defendant") hereby stipulate to extend the time
("Plaintiff') and Defendant Hirease, LLC (“Defendant”) hereby stipulate
6
within which Defendant has to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
7
Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on November 24, 2014, and Defendant was served
8
with the Complaint and Summons on December 10, 2014. With this Stipulation, Defendant’s deadline
Summons on December 10, 2014.
Defendant's
9
for answering or otherwise responding to the Complaint is extended to February 16, 2015.
10
11
The parties respectfully submit this Stipulation to the Court pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a).
DATED: January 26, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
12
ER
R NIA
dw
Judge E
Chen
ard M.
A
H
18
19
ERED
O ORD D
IT IS S
IE
DIF
AS MO
LI
UNIT
ED
17
RT
16
NO
15
By: /s/ Timothy Hix
Pamela Q. Devata
Timothy L. Hix
Sarah K. Hamilton
Attorneys for Defendant
HIREASE, LLC
RT
U
O
S
14
FO
13
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Number should
be changed to C14-5200 EMC.
________________
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
Edward M. Chen
AT
T
U.S. District Judge
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
DATED: January 26, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
AHDOOT & WOLFSON, P.C.
20
21
By: /s/ Tina Wolfson
Tina Wolfson
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ABDUL KADIR MOHAMED
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05200-MEJ
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
18891677v.1
1
2
3
4
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)
RULE 5-1(0(3)
I, Timothy Hix, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the
signatory Tina Wolfson.
Executed this 26th day of January 2015 in Los Angeles, California.
5
By: /s/ Timothy Hix
/s/ Timothy
Timothy Hix
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05200-MEJ
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
18891677v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?