Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
244
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 243 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 242 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, Order on Motion for Settlement filed by Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/7/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
ROD M. FLIEGEL, SBN 168289
rfliegel@littler.com
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
333 Bush Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Tel: 415.433.1940; Fax: 415.399.8490
Attorneys for Defendants
Tina Wolfson (SBN 174806)
twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com
AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC
1016 Palm Avenue
West Hollywood, California 90069
Tel: (310) 474-9111; Fax: (310) 474-8585
Laura L. Ho (SBN 173179)
lho@gbdhlegal.com
GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO
300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000
Oakland, California 94612
Tel: (510) 763-9800; Fax: (510) 835-1417
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
15
16
17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
In Re Uber FCRA Litigation
19
Case No. 14-cv-05200-EMC
Consolidated with: 14-cv-05241-EMC
15-cv-03009-EMC
22
STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE
PARTIES’ TIME TO RESPOND TO THE
COURT’S PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
ORDER FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
(DKT. 242)
23
Complaint Filed: November 24, 2014
24
Trial Date: None set.
20
21
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND THE PARTIES’ TIME
TO RESPOND TO PRELIM. APP. ORDER
1.
3:14-cv-05200-EMC
1
2
WHEREAS, on June 29, 2017, the Court issued its Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement (Dkt. 242).
3
WHEREAS, the Court ordered the Parties to submit to devise and submit a design for a “trial
4
test run … to ascertain what percentage [of emails] are likely to be blocked as spam … within seven
5
(7) days from the date of … [the] order for approval.” (Dkt. 242, 15: 20-23.)
6
WHEREAS, since June 29, 2017, the Parties have worked diligently to submit the design for
7
the trial test run by July 6, 2017, however, given the holiday weekend and logistics involved in
8
devising a design for such a test run (i.e. consultation with appropriate experts, meet and confer
9
between the Parties themselves), the Parties will require an additional fourteen (14) days (to July 20,
10
2017) to make a submission to the Court on this issue.
11
THEREFORE, the Parties to this Stipulation hereby stipulate and respectfully request as
12
follows: that the Court extend the deadline for the Parties to make its submission regarding the email
13
test (along with an updated Preliminary Approval Order) on or before July 20, 2017.
14
15
Dated: July 5, 2017
16
/s/ Rod M. Fliegel
Rod M. Fliegel
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies,
Inc. and Rasier, LLC
17
18
19
Dated: July 5, 2017
20
/s/Tina Wolfson
Tina Wolfson
AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
21
22
23
Dated: July 5, 2017
24
/s/ Laura L. Ho
Laura L. Ho
GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN &
HO
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND THE PARTIES’ TIME
TO RESPOND TO PRELIM. APP. ORDER
2.
3:14-cv-05200-EMC
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
1
2
3
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document.
4
5
/s/ Rod M. Fliegel
ROD M. FLIEGEL
Dated: July 5, 2017
6
7
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
12
DERED
RT
15
J
ER
H
16
17
. Chen
ward M
udge Ed
NO
14
FO
13
R NIA
O OR
___________________________________
IT IS S
HON. EDWARD M. CHEN
LI
11
July 7
Dated: ______________, 2017
A
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
S
9
UNIT
ED
8
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND THE PARTIES’ TIME
TO RESPOND TO PRELIM. APP. ORDER
3.
3:14-cv-05200-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?