Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 244

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 243 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 242 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, Order on Motion for Settlement filed by Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/7/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ROD M. FLIEGEL, SBN 168289 rfliegel@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Tel: 415.433.1940; Fax: 415.399.8490 Attorneys for Defendants Tina Wolfson (SBN 174806) twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC 1016 Palm Avenue West Hollywood, California 90069 Tel: (310) 474-9111; Fax: (310) 474-8585 Laura L. Ho (SBN 173179) lho@gbdhlegal.com GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000 Oakland, California 94612 Tel: (510) 763-9800; Fax: (510) 835-1417 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 15 16 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In Re Uber FCRA Litigation 19 Case No. 14-cv-05200-EMC Consolidated with: 14-cv-05241-EMC 15-cv-03009-EMC 22 STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE PARTIES’ TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COURT’S PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING (DKT. 242) 23 Complaint Filed: November 24, 2014 24 Trial Date: None set. 20 21 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE PARTIES’ TIME TO RESPOND TO PRELIM. APP. ORDER 1. 3:14-cv-05200-EMC 1 2 WHEREAS, on June 29, 2017, the Court issued its Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement (Dkt. 242). 3 WHEREAS, the Court ordered the Parties to submit to devise and submit a design for a “trial 4 test run … to ascertain what percentage [of emails] are likely to be blocked as spam … within seven 5 (7) days from the date of … [the] order for approval.” (Dkt. 242, 15: 20-23.) 6 WHEREAS, since June 29, 2017, the Parties have worked diligently to submit the design for 7 the trial test run by July 6, 2017, however, given the holiday weekend and logistics involved in 8 devising a design for such a test run (i.e. consultation with appropriate experts, meet and confer 9 between the Parties themselves), the Parties will require an additional fourteen (14) days (to July 20, 10 2017) to make a submission to the Court on this issue. 11 THEREFORE, the Parties to this Stipulation hereby stipulate and respectfully request as 12 follows: that the Court extend the deadline for the Parties to make its submission regarding the email 13 test (along with an updated Preliminary Approval Order) on or before July 20, 2017. 14 15 Dated: July 5, 2017 16 /s/ Rod M. Fliegel Rod M. Fliegel LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC 17 18 19 Dated: July 5, 2017 20 /s/Tina Wolfson Tina Wolfson AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC Attorneys for Plaintiffs 21 22 23 Dated: July 5, 2017 24 /s/ Laura L. Ho Laura L. Ho GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO Attorneys for Plaintiffs 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE PARTIES’ TIME TO RESPOND TO PRELIM. APP. ORDER 2. 3:14-cv-05200-EMC SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 1 2 3 In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document. 4 5 /s/ Rod M. Fliegel ROD M. FLIEGEL Dated: July 5, 2017 6 7 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 12 DERED RT 15 J ER H 16 17 . Chen ward M udge Ed NO 14 FO 13 R NIA O OR ___________________________________ IT IS S HON. EDWARD M. CHEN LI 11 July 7 Dated: ______________, 2017 A 10 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: S 9 UNIT ED 8 N F D IS T IC T O R C 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE PARTIES’ TIME TO RESPOND TO PRELIM. APP. ORDER 3. 3:14-cv-05200-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?