Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 246

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 245 Stipulated Request and [Proposed] Order to Further Extend the Parties' Time to Respond to the Court's Preliminary Approval Order by 8/10/17(DKT. 242) filed by Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/18/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2017)

1

7

Tina Wolfson (SBN 174806)
[e-mail]
Robert Ahdoot (SBN 172098)
[e-mail]
Theodore W. Maya (SBN 223242)
[e-mail]
Bradley K. King (SBN 274399)
[e-mail]
AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC
1016 Palm Avenue
West Hollywood, CA 90069
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

8

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Classes

9

ROD M. FLIEGEL, Bar No. 168289
[e-mail]
JOHN C. FISH, Jr., Bar No. 160620
[e-mail]
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
333 Bush Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone:
415.433.1940
Facsimile:
415.399.8490

2
3
4
5
6

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendants
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
[Additional Counsel Listed on Following Page]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19
20

In Re Uber FCRA Litigation

21

Case No. 14-cv-05200-EMC
Consolidated with: 14-cv-05241-EMC
15-cv-03009-EMC

24

STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER
EXTEND THE PARTIES’ TIME TO
RESPOND TO THE COURT’S
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER
(DKT. 242)

25

Complaint Filed: November 24, 2014

26

Trial Date: None set.

22
23

27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND THE PARTIES’ TIME
TO RESPOND TO PRELIM. APP. ORDER

1.

3:14-cv-05200-EMC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Laura L. Ho (SBN 173179)
[e-mail]
Andrew P. Lee (SBN 245903)
[e-mail]
William C. Jhaveri-Weeks (SBN 289984)
[e-mail]
GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN,
DARDARIAN & HO
300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Meredith Desautels (SBN 259725)
[e-mail]
Dana Isaac Quinn (SBN 278848)
[e-mail]
LAWYERS’ COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL
RIGHTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO
BAY AREA
131 Steuart Street, Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative
Classes

16
17

ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, Bar No. 5360847
[e-mail]
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
900 Third Avenue, 8th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 212.832.2719
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN
132099
[e-mail]
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
[e-mail]
DHANANJAY MANTHRIPRAGADA,
SBN 254433
[e-mail]
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
[e-mail]
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
[e-mail]
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.8306
Attorneys for Defendants
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND THE PARTIES’ TIME
TO RESPOND TO PRELIM. APP. ORDER

2.

3:14-cv-05200-EMC

1
2

WHEREAS, on June 29, 2017, the Court issued its Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement (Dkt. 242).

3

WHEREAS, the Court ordered the Parties to devise and submit a design for a “trial test run

4

… to ascertain what percentage [of emails] are likely to be blocked as spam … within seven (7) days

5

from the date of … [the] order for approval.” (Dkt. 242, 15: 20-23).

6
7
8
9

WHEREAS, at the request of the Parties, the Court extended the deadline for the Parties to
make their submission regarding the email trial test run to July 20, 2017. (Dkt. 244).
WHEREAS, since June 29, 2017, the Parties have worked diligently to submit the design for
the trial test run by July 20, 2017;

10

WHEREAS, the Parties need some additional time to further confer about the design for such

11

a test run, but are encountering some scheduling conflicts due to, among other things, summer

12

vacation schedules;

13

THEREFORE, the Parties to this Stipulation hereby stipulate and respectfully request as

14

follows: that the Court extend the deadline for the Parties to make their submission regarding the

15

email test (along with an updated Preliminary Approval Order) to on or before August 10, 2017.

16
17

Dated: July 18, 2017

18

/s/ Rod M. Fliegel
Rod M. Fliegel
John C. Fish, Jr.
Andrew Spurchise
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

19
20
21

Joshua S. Lipshutz
Kevin J. Ring Dowell
Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.
Theane D. Evangelis
Dhananjay Manthripragada
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

22
23
24

Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies,
Inc. and Rasier, LLC

25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND THE PARTIES’ TIME
TO RESPOND TO PRELIM. APP. ORDER

3.

3:14-cv-05200-EMC

1

Dated: July 18, 2017

2

5

/s/Tina Wolfson
Tina Wolfson
Robert Ahdoot
Theodore W. Maya
Bradley K. King
AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC

6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

3
4

7

Dated: July 18, 2017

8

11

/s/ Laura L. Ho
Laura L. Ho
Andrew P. Lee
William C. Jhaveri-Weeks
GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN &
HO

12

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

9
10

13
14
15

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document.

16
17
18

Dated: July 18, 2017

/s/ Rod M. Fliegel
ROD M. FLIEGEL

19
20
21

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

22
July 18
Dated: ______________, 2017

UNIT
ED

25

RT
U
O

S

24

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
S

UNIT
ED

R NIA

FO

M. Chen

H

LI

RT

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

hen

FO

dwa
Judge E

LI

3:14-cv-05200-EMC

ER

A

H

4.

RT

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND THE PARTIES’ TIME
TO RESPOND TO PRELIM. APP. ORDER

ORDERED

Judge Edward

ER

rd M. C

NO

28

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

IT IS SO

NO

27

OO
IT IS S
RT
U
O

26

R NIA

___________________________________
HON. EDWARDRDERED
M. CHEN
A

23

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C