Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 Stipulation to extend time to answer filed by Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/2/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

JOHN C. FISH, Jr., Bar No. 160620
[e-mail]
ROD M. FLIEGEL, Bar No. 168289
[e-mail]
ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, Bar No. 245998
[e-mail]
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, California 94108.2693
Telephone:
415.433.1940
Facsimile:
415.399.8490
Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and
Rasier, LLC

15

TINA WOLFSON, Bar No. 174806
[e-mail]
ROBERT AHDOOT, Bar No. 172098
[e-mail]
THEODORE W. MAYA, Bar No. 223242
[e-mail]
BRADLEY K. KING, Bar No. 274399
[e-mail]
AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC
16 Palm Ave.
West Hollywood, CA 90069
Telephone: [phone]

16

Attorneys for Plaintiff Abdul Kadir Mohamed

10
11
12
13
14

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

21

ABDUL KADIR MOHAMED,

22
23
24
25
26

Plaintiff,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; RASIER,
LLC; HIREASE, LLC; and DOES 1-50,

Case No. CV 14-5200 EMC
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO
ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S
COMPLAINT TO FEBRUARY 6, 2015 ON
BEHALF OF DEFENDANTS UBER
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND RAISER,
LLC

Defendant

27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 14-5200-EMC

1
2
3

DEFENDANTS UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (“UBER”), RAISER, LLC (“RAISER”),
AND PLAINTIFF HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
1.

The deadline for Defendants Uber and Rasier to answer, move, or otherwise respond

4

to the Complaint in the above-entitled action serviced on Uber on December 16, 2014 and on Rasier

5

on December 9, 2014, shall be extended to February 6, 2015, the Court permitting. The parties are

6

requesting the extension of time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to afford the parties

7

additional time to meet and confer regarding a proposed consolidated and modified briefing

8

schedule, in light of Uber’s motion to compel arbitration in the related case of Gillette v. Uber

9

Technologies, Inc., Case No. 3:14-cv-05241, and Defendants’ anticipated motion to compel

10

arbitration in the captioned matter. On December 18, 2014, Uber and Rasier requested that the

11

deadline be extended until January 30, 2015, which the Court previously granted. The instant

12

extension is only for an additional week period, and therefore the requested modification would not

13

interfere with the Court's schedule of this case. The case management conference in this matter will

14

not take place until March 12, 2015. (Dkt. No. 17.)

15

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

16
17

Dated: January 30, 2015

18
19

/s/ Rod M. Fliegel
Rod M. Fliegel
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies,
Inc. and Rasier, LLC

20
21
22

S

RT

R NIA

ER

A

H

27

/s/ Tina Wolfson
Tina Wolfson
AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC
Attorneys for Plaintiff Abdul Kadir Mohamed

FO

NO

26

IT IS SO ORDERED:
ERED
O ORD
_______________________
IT IS S
Edward M. Chen ard M. Chen
w
Judge Ed
U.S. District Judge
LI

25

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

24

Dated: January 30, 2015
UNIT
ED

23

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

1.

CASE NO. 14-5200-EMC