Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
284
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 283 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Modifying Settlement Agreement (REVISED) filed by Ronald Gillette, Shannon Wise, Abdul Kadir Mohamed, Meghan Christenson, Brandon Farmer. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/19/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
Case No.: 14-cv-05200-EMC
11
12
13
IN RE UBER FCRA LITIGATION
[REVISED PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT
15
Date:
Time:
Dept:
Before:
16
Trial Date:
14
Date
Time
Dept
Hon. Edward M. Chen
None Set
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
708990.2
[REVISED PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT – CASE NO. 14-CV-05200-EMC
1
The Court, having reviewed the parties’ Revised Stipulation Re Modification To Settlement
2
Agreement filed on April 17, 2018, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby modifies the definition
3
of “Settlement Class Members’ Released Claims” in the parties’ “Stipulation of Settlement” (Dkt. 222
4
¶ 41) to read as follows:
5
‘Settlement Class Members’ Released Claims’ means and includes all manner of action,
6
causes of action, claims, demands, rights, suits, obligations, restitution, debts, contracts,
7
agreements, promises, liabilities, damages, charges, penalties, losses, costs, expenses,
8
and attorneys’ fees, of any nature whatsoever, known or unknown, in law or equity, fixed
9
or contingent, which Plaintiffs and Settlement Class Members have or may have arising
10
out of or relating to any allegations made in the Action, any legal theories that could have
11
been raised based on the allegations in the Action, and all claims of any kind relating in
12
any way to, or arising out of, background checks and/or consumer reports of any kind
13
presented in the Action based on the facts alleged in the Complaint, including but not
14
limited to claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), California Consumer
15
Reporting Agencies Act, California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act,
16
California Private Attorney General Act claims pursuant to Cal. Labor Code § 2699,
17
based on alleged violations of California Labor Code §1024.5, California Business and
18
Professions Code section 17200, and Massachusetts CORI related claims. “Settlement
19
Class Members’ Released Claims” includes claims for actual, statutory, liquidated,
20
punitive or any other form of damages, as well as for attorneys’ fees and costs.
21
“Settlement Class Members’ Released Claims” shall be construed as broadly as possible
22
to affect complete finality over this Action. Provided, however, that no PAGA claims or
23
any other labor law claims are released except those asserted in the Eleventh Cuase of
24
Action in the Amended Master Consolidated Complaint, i.e. claims based on the
25
impermissible use of consumer credit reports for employment purposes, in violation of
26
Labor Code § 1024.5 See In re Uber FCRA Litig., Docket No. 171 at 28-29.
27
28
1
708990.2
[REVISED PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT – CASE NO. 14-CV-05200-EMC
1
Inasmuch as the Court’s Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class
2
Action Settlement (Dkt. 242) (hereafter “the Order”) recited the parties’ prior definition of “Settlement
3
Class Members’ Released Claims,” page 4 lines 10 to 20 of the Order are hereby vacated and replaced
4
with the definition of that term as stated above.
5
The Court finds that these modifications to the parties’ “Stipulation of Settlement” (Dkt. 222)
6
and the Order (Dkt. 242) are properly made without further notice to the class because the
7
modifications are for the benefit of the class.
10
Honorable Edward M. Chenen
d M. Ch
United States District Judge
e Edwar
Judg
ER
15
A
H
14
FO
RT
13
4/19/18
NO
12
Dated:
LI
11
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
R NIA
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
9
RT
U
O
S
8
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
708990.2
[REVISED PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT – CASE NO. 14-CV-05200-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?