Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 36

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 35 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 32 Notice (Other) RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON HIREASES JOINDER IN MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION filed by Abdul Kadir Mohamed. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/3/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

TINA WOLFSON, SBN 174806
[e-mail]
ROBERT AHDOOT, SBN 172098
[e-mail]
THEODORE W. MAYA, SBN 223242
[e-mail]
BRADLEY K. KING, SBN 274399
[e-mail]
AHDOOT & WOLFSON, P.C.
1016 Palm Ave.
West Hollywood, California 90069
Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiff
ABDUL KADIR MOHAMED

10
11
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
San Francisco Division

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

ABDUL KADIR MOHAMED, individually and on Case No. 14-5200-EMC
behalf of all others similarly situated,
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON HIREASE’S
JOINDER IN MOTION TO COMPEL
Plaintiff,
ARBITRATION
v.
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; RASIER, LLC;
HIREASE, LLC; and DOES 1-50,
Defendants

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

STIP RE BRIEFING ON JOINDER IN MOT. TO COMPEL ARB., NO. 14-5200

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

WHEREAS, Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC filed a motion to compel
arbitration in this action on February 6, 2015 (Docket No. 28, the “Motion”);
WHEREAS, on February 9, 2015, this Court entered a stipulated Order that, inter alia, set a
consolidated briefing schedule governing briefing on the Motion (Docket No. 29);
WHEREAS, on February 13, 2015, Defendant Hirease, LLC (“Hirease”), filed a Joinder in the
Motion (Docket No. 32, the “Joinder”); and
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Hirease wish to clarify and confirm their mutual understanding that
the same briefing schedule governing the Motion applies to the Joinder in that Motion;
NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Hirease stipulate and request as follows:
That the Court enter an Order confirming that any opposition and reply concerning the Joinder

11

shall follow the same consolidated briefing schedule entered by the Court with respect to the Motion.

12

Specifically, Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion (and the Joinder) is due March 5, 2015, and any

13

reply in support of the Motion (and the Joinder) is due March 20, 2015.

14
15

SO STIPULATED

16
17

Dated: February 25, 2015

AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

/s/ Theodore W. Maya
Tina Wolfson
Robert Ahdoot
Theodore W. Maya
Bradley K. King
16 Palm Ave.,
West Hollywood, California 90069
Tel: [phone]
Facsimile: 310-474-8585
Counsel for Plaintiff
ABDUL KADIR MOHAMED

26
27
28
29
30
31

1
STIP RE BRIEFING ON JOINDER IN MOT. TO COMPEL ARB., NO. 14-5200

1

Dated: February 26, 2015

2

By: _______________________________
Paul K. Schrieffer, Esq.
Mitchell J. Freedman, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant, Hirease, LLC

3
4
5

P. K. SCHRIEFFER LLP

Dated: February 26, 2015

6

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
By: _________/s/_____________________
Sarah K. Hamilton, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant, Hirease, LLC

7
8
9
10

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

11
12
13
14

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document.
Dated: February 25, 2015

/s/ Theodore W. Maya
Theodore W. Maya

15
16
17
18
19
20

March

3rd

RT

27

JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN
n
M. Che
Edward
Judge

NO

26

R NIA

25

DERED
SO OR
IT IS _______________________________________

FO

24

UNIT
ED

23

RT
U
O

S

22

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

28
29
30
31

A

H

ER

LI

21

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, this __ day of February 2015.

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

2
STIP RE BRIEFING ON JOINDER IN MOT. TO COMPEL ARB., NO. 14-5200