Ramirez et al v. BRNK Santa Rosa LLC et al

Filing 26

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 23 Stipulation for Plaintiff to File Second Amended Comaplaint.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2015)

1
2
3
4

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)
THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
4328 Redwood Hwy., Suite 300
San Rafael, CA 94903
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]

5
6

Attorney for Plaintiffs
IRMA RAMIREZ and
DAREN HEATHERLY

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

IRMA RAMIREZ; and DAREN
HEATHERLY,

)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
BRNK SANTA ROSA LLC, a Delaware
)
Limited Liability Company; EMILIA
)
OCHOA and EMILIANO OCHOA dba EL )
PATIO MEXICAN FOOD; JOHN S.
)
STROUZAS AND BETSIE J. STROUZAS, )
Trustees under Revocable Trust dated July )
2, 1986; SPYRIDON J. STROUZAS; and )
BARBARA F. STROUZAS,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)

CASE NO. 3:14-cv-05224-VC
Civil Rights
SECOND STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS
TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT

20
IT IS STIPULATED, by and through plaintiffs IRMA RAMIREZ and DAREN
21
HEATHERLY, and Defendants EMILIA OCHOA and EMILIANO OCHOA dba EL PATIO
22
MEXICAN FOOD, respective attorney of record that plaintiffs be permitted leave to file the
23
proposed Second Amended Complaint (attached as Exhibit “A” is the proposed Second
24
Amended Complaint) for the following reasons:
25
1.

Whereas, plaintiffs’ counsel has learned that defendants JOHN S. STROUZAS

26
and BETSIE J. STROUZAS, Trustees under Revocable Trust dated July 2, 1986, SPYRIDON J.
27
STROUZAS and BARBARA F. STROUZAS are not the property owner for (land and building)
28
SECOND STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-05224-VC

1

1

located at or near 425 Stony Point Road, Santa Rosa, California. A Notice of Voluntary l

2

Dismissal has been filed; and

3

2.

Whereas, plaintiffs’ counsel has further investigated the matter and has found

4

and named the correct property owners for (land and building) located at or near 425 Stony Point

5

Road, Santa Rosa, California in the complaint. The correct property owners are FRED J. F. LEE

6

and JEAN K. LEE, Trustees of the Lee Family Trust, U.D.T. July 26, 1996; SALLY JANE LEE,

7

Trustee of the Sally Jane Lee Survivor’s Trust u/t Carl Kwock Fon Lee and Sally Jane Lee

8

Revocable Trust, dated April 23, 1996; SALLY JANE LEE, Trustee of the Carl Lee QTIP Trust

9

u/t Carl Kwock Fon Lee and Sally Jane Lee Revocable Trust, dated April 23, 1996; SALLY

10

JANE LEE, Trustee of the Carl Lee Bypass Trust u/t Carl Kwock Fon Lee and Sally Jane Lee

11

Revocable Trust, dated April 23, 1996; and

12

3.

Whereas, the answer previously filed by defendants EMILIA OCHOA and

13

EMILIANO OCHOA dba EL PATIO MEXICAN FOOD shall serve as the answer for defendants

14

to the Second Amended Complaint.

15
16

Respectfully Submitted,

17
18

Dated: August 31, 2015

19

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

20
21

By:

/s/Thomas E. Frankovich
Thomas E. Frankovich
Attorney for Plaintiffs IRMA RAMIREZ and
DAREN HEATHERLY

22
23
24
25

Dated: August 31, 2015

JASON G. GONG
LAW OFFICES OF JASON G. GONG

26
27

By:________/s/Jason G. Gong________________
Jason G. Gong

28
SECOND STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-05224-VC

2

1

Attorney for Defendants EMILIA OCHOA and

2

EMILIANO OCHOA dba EL PATIO MEXICAN

3

FOOD

4
5
6

ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs IRMA RAMIREZ

7

and DAREN HEATHERLY have leave of this Court to file the Second Amended Complaint

8

attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” and that the answer previously filed by defendants EMILIA

9

OCHOA and EMILIANO OCHOA dba EL PATIO MEXICAN FOOD shall be deemed an

10

answer to the Second Amended Complaint.

11
12
13
14

September 2
Dated: ________________, 2015

_________________________________________
Honorable Vince Chhabria
United States District Judge of California

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECOND STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-05224-VC

3