Grayson v. County of Marin et al

Filing 34

SCHEDULING ORDER. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/26/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Trial set for 9/19/2016 - 10/4/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 12, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

CHAKA GRAYSON,

Case No. 14-cv-05225-JST

Plaintiff,
9
v.

SCHEDULING ORDER

10
11

COUNTY OF MARIN, et al.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.
12
13
14
15

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

16
Event

Deadline

17
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings

07/17/15

Fact discovery cut-off

03/18/16

20

Expert disclosures

04/08/16

21

Expert rebuttal

04/29/16

22

Expert discovery cut-off

05/13/16

Deadline to file dispositive motions

06/03/16

Pretrial conference statement due

08/16/16

Pretrial conference

8/26/16 at 2:00 p.m.

Trial

9/19/16 at 8:30 a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days)

Ten

18
19

23
24
25
26
27
28

1
2
3
4
5

The Court refers this case to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler for a settlement conference.
This conference shall be completed by August 14, 2015.
Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire

6

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely

7

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their

8

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.

9

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant

12

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause

13

to grant a continuance.

14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 12, 2015

16
17
18

_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2