Artifex Software, Inc. v. Entwrx Ltd.

Filing 28

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 27 Stipulation for Protective Order. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

DARIN SNYDER (S.B. #136003)
[e-mail]
DAVID SEPANIK (S.B. #221527)
[e-mail]
JESSE KOEHLER (S.B. #300530)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3823
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ARTIFEX SOFTWARE, INC.
MICHAEL H. BIERMAN (S.B. #89156)
[e-mail]
MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP
300 South Grand Avenue, 14th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
ENTWRX LTD.

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18

ARTIFEX SOFTWARE, INC.,
Plaintiff,

19
v.

20
21

ENTWRX LTD.,

24
25
26
27

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING
PATENTS, HIGHLY SENSITIVE
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
AND/OR TRADE SECRETS

Defendant.

22
23

Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-05231-MEJ

1.

PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure
and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly,
the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective

28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1

Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all

2

disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and

3

use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under

4

the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 13.4, below,

5

that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under

6

seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that

7

will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal.

8

2.

9
10
11

DEFINITIONS
2.1

Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of

information or items under this Order.
2.2

“CASE CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it

12

is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule

13

of Civil Procedure 26(c).

14
15
16

2.3

Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well

as their support staff).
2.4

Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it

17

produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CASE CONFIDENTIAL,” “CASE

18

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “CASE CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE

19

CODE.”

20

2.5

Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the

21

medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things,

22

testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or

23

responses to discovery in this matter.

24

2.6

Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to

25

the litigation who (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as

26

a consultant in this action, (2) is not a past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s

27

competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or

28

of a Party’s competitor.
-2-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1

2.7

“CASE CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items:

2

extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another Party or

3

Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less

4

restrictive means.

5

2.8

“CASE CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” Information or Items: extremely

6

sensitive “Confidential Information or Items” representing computer code and associated

7

comments and revision histories, formulas, engineering specifications, or schematics that define or

8

otherwise describe in detail the algorithms or structure of software or hardware designs, disclosure

9

of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could

10

not be avoided by

11

less restrictive means.

12
13
14
15
16

2.9

House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House

Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.
2.10

Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal

entity not named as a Party to this action.
2.11

Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this

17

action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action

18

on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party.

19
20
21
22
23

2.12

Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,

consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs).
2.13

Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery

Material in this action.
2.14

Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services

24

(e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing,

25

storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors.

26

2.15

Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as

27

“CASE CONFIDENTIAL,” “CASE CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or as

28

“CASE CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE.”
-3-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1

2.16

Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a

2

Producing Party.

3

3.

4

SCOPE
The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material

5

(as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all

6

copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony,

7

conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.

8

However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following

9

information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a

10

Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a

11

result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public

12

record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the

13

disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the

14

information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party, except

15

insofar as any such information constitutes a trade secret or other confidential and proprietary

16

information of Plaintiff which has been identified with reasonable particularity, is alleged in this

17

action to have been misused or misappropriated by Defendant, and otherwise qualifies as Protected

18

Material herein. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or

19

order.

20

4.

21

DURATION
Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this

22

Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order

23

otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and

24

defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the

25

completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action,

26

including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to

27

applicable law.

28
-4-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1
2

5.

DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1

Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or

3

Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to

4

limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. To the

5

extent it is practical to do so, the Designating Party must designate for protection only those

6

materials, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other

7

materials, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not

8

swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.

9

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown

10

to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily

11

encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens

12

on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.

13

If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated for

14

protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify for the level of protection initially

15

asserted, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the

16

mistaken designation.

17

5.2

Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order

18

(see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered,

19

Disclosure or Discovery

20
21
22
23

Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before
the material is disclosed or produced.
Designation in conformity with this Order requires:
(a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but

24

excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party

25

affix the legend “CASE CONFIDENTIAL,” “CASE CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES

26

ONLY,” or “CASE CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” to each page that contains protected

27

material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the

28
-5-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1

Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

2

markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted.

3

A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection

4

need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which material

5

it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the

6

material made available for inspection shall be deemed “CASE CONFIDENTIAL –

7

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants

8

copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof,

9

qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the

10

Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CASE CONFIDENTIAL,” “CASE

11

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “CASE CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE

12

CODE) to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material

13

on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected

14

portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each

15

portion, the level of protection being asserted.

16

(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the

17

Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other

18

proceeding, all protected testimony and specify the level of protection being asserted. When it is

19

impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection and it

20

appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the Designating Party

21

may invoke on the record (before the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding is concluded) a right

22

to have up to 21 days to identify the specific portions of the testimony as to which protection is

23

sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted. Only those portions of the testimony

24

that are appropriately designated for protection within the 21 days shall be covered by the

25

provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. Alternatively, a Designating Party may specify, at

26

the deposition or up to 21 days afterwards if that period is properly invoked, that the entire

27

transcript shall be treated as “CASE CONFIDENTIAL” or “CASE CONFIDENTIAL –

28

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
-6-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1

Parties shall give the other parties notice if they reasonably expect a deposition, hearing or

2

other proceeding to include Protected Material so that the other parties can ensure that only

3

authorized individuals who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”

4

(Exhibit A) are present at those proceedings. The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition

5

shall not in any way affect its designation as “CASE CONFIDENTIAL” or “CASE

6

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”

7

Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an obvious legend on the title page that

8

the transcript contains Protected Material, and the title page shall be followed by a list of all pages

9

(including line numbers as appropriate) that have been designated as Protected Material and the

10

level of protection being asserted by the Designating Party. The Designating Party shall inform the

11

court reporter of these requirements. Any transcript that is prepared before the expiration of a 21-

12

day period for designation shall be treated during that period as if it had been designated “CASE

13

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” in its entirety unless otherwise agreed. After

14

the expiration of that period, the transcript shall be treated only as actually designated.

15

(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any

16

other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the

17

container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CASE

18

CONFIDENTIAL,” “CASE CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “CASE

19

CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE.” If only a portion or portions of the information or item

20

warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected

21

portion(s) and specify the level of protection being asserted.

22

5.3

Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to

23

designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s

24

right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a

25

designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated

26

in accordance with the provisions of this Order.

27
28
-7-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1
2

6.

CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1

Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of

3

confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality

4

designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic

5

burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to

6

challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the

7

original designation is disclosed.

8

6.2

Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process

9

by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis for each

10

challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written notice must

11

recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this specific paragraph

12

of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must

13

begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication

14

are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In conferring, the Challenging

15

Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and

16

must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the

17

circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen

18

designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it

19

has engaged in this meet and confer process first or establishes that the Designating Party is

20

unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in a timely manner.

21

6.3

Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court

22

intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under

23

Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) within 21 days of

24

the initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties agreeing that the meet and confer

25

process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Each such motion must be accompanied

26

by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer

27

requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph. Failure by the Designating Party to make such a

28

motion including the required declaration within 21 days (or 14 days, if applicable) shall
-8-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1

automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each challenged designation. In addition,

2

the Challenging Party may file a motion challenging a confidentiality designation at any time if

3

there is good cause for doing so, including a challenge to the designation of a deposition transcript

4

or any portions thereof. Any motion brought pursuant to this provision must be accompanied by a

5

competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer

6

requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph.

7

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating

8

Party. Frivolous challenges and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose

9

unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions.

10

Unless the Designating Party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to file a motion

11

to retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the material in

12

question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until

13

the court rules on the challenge.

14

7.

15

ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
7.1

Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or

16

produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting,

17

defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to

18

the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has

19

been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 14 below (FINAL

20

DISPOSITION).

21
22

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in
a secure manner1 that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.

23

7.2

Disclosure of “CASE CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise

24

ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may

25

disclose any information or item designated “CASE CONFIDENTIAL” only to:

26
27
28

1

It may be appropriate under certain circumstances to require the Receiving Party to store any electronic Protected Material in
password-protected form.

-9-

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as

2

employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the

3

information for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be

4

Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A;

5

(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the

6

Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed

7

the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

8
9
10

(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is
reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement
to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

11

(d) the court and its personnel;

12

(e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and

13

Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have

14

signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

15

(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably

16

necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A),

17

unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed

18

deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately

19

bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this

20

Stipulated Protective Order.

21
22
23

(g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian
or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.
7.3

Disclosure of “CASE CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” and

24

“CASE CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by

25

the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any

26

information or item designated “CASE CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or

27

“CASE CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” only to:

28
- 10 -

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as

2

employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the

3

information for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be

4

Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A;

5

(b) Experts of the Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary

6

for this litigation, (2) who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”

7

(Exhibit A), and (3) as to whom the procedures set forth in paragraph 7.4(a), below, have been

8

followed;

9

(c) the court and its personnel;

10

(d) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants (including

11

mock jurors), and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this

12

litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

13

and

14
15
16

(e) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian
or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.
7.4 Procedures for Approving or Objecting to Disclosure of “CASE CONFIDENTIAL –

17

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “CASE CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” Information or

18

Items to Experts.

19

(a) Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed to in writing by the Designating

20

Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an Expert (as defined in this Order) any information or item

21

that has been designated “CASE CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “CASE

22

CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” pursuant to paragraph 7.3(b) first must make a written

23

request to the Designating Party that (1) identifies the general categories of “CASE

24

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “CASE CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE

25

CODE” information that the Receiving Party seeks permission to disclose to the Expert, (2) sets

26

forth the full name of the Expert and the city and state of his or her primary residence, (3) attaches

27

a copy of the Expert’s current resume, (4) identifies the Expert’s current employer(s), (5) identifies

28

each person or entity from whom the Expert has received compensation or funding for work in his
- 11 -

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1

or her areas of expertise or to whom the expert has provided professional services, including in

2

connection with a litigation, at any time during the preceding five years,2 and (6) identifies (by

3

name and number of the case, filing date, and location of court) any litigation in connection with

4

which the Expert has offered expert testimony, including through a declaration, report, or

5

testimony at a deposition or trial, during the preceding five years.3

6

(b) A Party that makes a request and provides the information specified in the

7

preceding respective paragraphs may disclose the subject Protected Material to the identified

8

Expert unless, within 14 days of delivering the request, the Party receives a written objection from

9

the Designating Party. Any such objection must set forth in detail the grounds on which it is based.

10

(c) A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with the

11

Designating Party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to resolve the matter by agreement

12

within seven days of the written objection. If no agreement is reached, the Party seeking to make

13

the disclosure to the Expert may file a motion as provided in Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance

14

with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) seeking permission from the court to do so. Any such

15

motion must describe the circumstances with specificity, set forth in detail the reasons why the

16

disclosure to the Expert is reasonably necessary, assess the risk of harm that the disclosure would

17

entail, and suggest any additional means that could be used to reduce that risk. In addition, any

18

such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration describing the parties’ efforts to

19

resolve the matter by agreement (i.e., the extent and the content of the meet and confer discussions)

20

and setting forth the reasons advanced by the Designating Party for its refusal to approve the

21

disclosure.

22

In any such proceeding, the Party opposing disclosure to the Expert shall bear the burden of

23

proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail (under the safeguards proposed)

24

outweighs the Receiving Party’s need to disclose the Protected Material to its Expert.

25
2

26
27
28

If the Expert believes any of this information is subject to a confidentiality obligation to a third-party, then the Expert should
provide whatever information the Expert believes can be disclosed without violating any confidentiality agreements, and the Party
seeking to disclose to the Expert shall be available to meet and confer with the Designating Party regarding any such engagement.
3

It may be appropriate in certain circumstances to restrict the Expert from undertaking certain limited work prior to the termination
of the litigation that could foreseeably result in an improper use of the Designating Party’s “CASE CONFIDENTIAL –
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information.

- 12 -

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1

8.

2

SOURCE CODE
(a)

To the extent production of source code becomes necessary in this case, a

3

Producing Party may designate source code as “CASE CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE” if it

4

comprises or includes confidential, proprietary or trade secret source code.

5

(b)

Protected Material designated as “CASE CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE

6

CODE” shall be subject to all of the protections afforded to “CASE CONFIDENTIAL –

7

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information and may be disclosed only to the individuals to whom

8

“CASE CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information may be disclosed, as set

9

forth in Paragraphs 7.3 and 7.4.

10

(c)

Any source code produced in discovery shall be made available for

11

inspection, in a format allowing it to be reasonably reviewed and searched, during normal business

12

hours or at other mutually agreeable times, at an office of the Producing Party’s counsel or another

13

mutually agreed upon location. The source code shall be made available for inspection on a secured

14

computer in a secured room without Internet access or network access to other computers, and the

15

Receiving Party shall not copy, remove, or otherwise transfer any portion of the source code onto

16

any recordable media or recordable device. The Producing Party may visually monitor the

17

activities of the Receiving Party’s representatives during any source code review, but only to

18

ensure that there is no unauthorized recording, copying, or transmission of the source code.4

19

(d)

The Receiving Party may request paper copies of limited portions of source

20

code that are reasonably necessary for the preparation of court filings, pleadings, expert reports, or

21

other papers, or for deposition or trial, but shall not request paper copies for the purposes of

22

reviewing the source code other than electronically as set forth in paragraph (c) in the first instance.

23

The Producing Party shall provide all such source code in paper form including bates numbers and

24

the label “CASE CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE.” The Producing Party may challenge the

25

amount of source code requested in hard copy form pursuant to the dispute resolution procedure

26
27
28

4

It may be appropriate under certain circumstances to require the Receiving Party to keep a paper log indicating the names of any
individuals inspecting the source code and dates and times of inspection, and the names of any individuals to whom paper copies of
portions of source code are provided.

- 13 -

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1

and timeframes set forth in Paragraph 6 whereby the Producing Party is the “Challenging Party”

2

and the Receiving Party is the “Designating Party” for purposes of dispute resolution.

3

(e)

The Receiving Party shall maintain a record of any individual who has

4

inspected any portion of the source code in electronic or paper form. The Receiving Party shall

5

maintain all paper copies of any printed portions of the source code in a secured, locked area. The

6

Receiving Party shall not create any electronic or other images of the paper copies and shall not

7

convert any of the information contained in the paper copies into any electronic format. The

8

Receiving Party shall only make additional paper copies if such additional copies are (1) necessary

9

to prepare court filings, pleadings, or other papers (including a testifying expert’s expert report),

10

(2) necessary for deposition, or (3) otherwise necessary for the preparation of its case. Any paper

11

copies used during a deposition shall be retrieved by the Producing Party at the end of each day and

12

must not be given to or left with a court reporter or any other unauthorized individual.5

13

9.

14

PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER
LITIGATION

15

If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that

16

compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CASE

17

CONFIDENTIAL,” or “CASE CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “CASE

18

CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” that Party must:

19
20

(a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include
a copy of the subpoena or court order;

21

(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in

22

the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to

23

this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and

24
25
26
27
28

5

The nature of the source code at issue in a particular case may warrant additional protections or restrictions, For example, it may
be appropriate under certain circumstances to require the Receiving Party to provide notice to the Producing Party before including
“CASE CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” information in a court filing, pleading, or expert report.

- 14 -

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1
2

(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the
Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.6

3

If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the

4

subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as “CASE

5

CONFIDENTIAL,” or “CASE CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “CASE

6

CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” before a determination by the court from which the

7

subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The

8

Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its

9

confidential material – and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or

10

encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.

11

10.

12

A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS
LITIGATION

13

(a)

The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-

14

Party in this action and designated as “CASE CONFIDENTIAL,” “CASE CONFIDENTIAL –

15

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “CASE CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE”. Such

16

information produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies

17

and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a

18

Non-Party from seeking additional protections.

19

(b)

In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce

20

a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an agreement

21

with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the Party shall:

22
23

1. promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that some
or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party;

24
25
26
27
28

6

The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the existence of this Protective Order and to afford the
Designating Party in this case an opportunity to try to protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or
order issued.

- 15 -

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1

2. promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective

2

Order in this litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of

3

the information requested; and

4

3. make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party.

5

(c)

If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court

6

within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may

7

produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-

8

Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its

9

possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a

10

determination by the court.7 Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the

11

burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.

12

11.

UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

13

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed

14

Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated

15

Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party

16

of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the

17

Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made

18

of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the

19

“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

20

12.

21

INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED
MATERIAL

22

When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently

23

produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the

24

Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision

25

is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that

26

provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence

27
28

7

The purpose of this provision is to alert the interested parties to the existence of confidentiality rights of a Non-Party and to afford
the Non-Party an opportunity to protect its confidentiality interests in this court.

- 16 -

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1

502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a

2

communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection,

3

the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order submitted to the

4

court.

5

13.

6
7
8
9

MISCELLANEOUS
13.1

Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to

seek its modification by the court in the future.
13.2

Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order

no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any

10

information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no

11

Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by

12

this Protective Order.

13

13.3

Export Control. Disclosure of Protected Material shall be subject to all applicable

14

laws and regulations relating to the export of technical data contained in such Protected Material,

15

including the release of such technical data to foreign persons or nationals in the United States or

16

elsewhere. The Producing Party shall be responsible for identifying any such controlled technical

17

data, and the Receiving Party shall take measures necessary to ensure compliance.

18

13.4

Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party or

19

a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the

20

public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any

21

Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may only be filed

22

under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected Material at

23

issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, a sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing

24

that the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise entitled

25

to protection under the law. If a Receiving Party's request to file Protected Material under seal

26

pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the

27

Protected Material in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e)(2) unless otherwise

28

instructed by the court.
- 17 -

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1
2

14.

FINAL DISPOSITION
Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 4,

3

each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such

4

material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts,

5

compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected

6

Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit

7

a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the

8

Designating Party) by the 60-day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all

9

the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has

10

not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or

11

capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to

12

retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts,

13

legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work

14

product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material.

15

Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this

16

Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION).

17

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

18
19

DATED: June 1, 2015

/s/ Darin W. Snyder
Darin W. Snyder
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff

DATED: June 1, 2015

/s/ Michael H. Bierman
Michael H. Bierman
MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP
Attorneys for Defendant

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

- 18 -

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1
2
3
4

ATTESTATION
I hereby attest that the other signatory listed concurs in this filing’s content and has
authorized the filing.
Dated: June 1, 2015

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

5
6

By:

7

/s/ Darin W. Snyder
Darin W. Snyder

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 19 -

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5

June 2, 2015
DATED: ________________________ _____________________________________
Honorable Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 20 -

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

1

EXHIBIT A

2

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

3

I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of

4

_________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read

5

in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States

6

District Court for the Northern District of California on ____________ [date] in the case of

7

Artifex Software, Inc. v. Entwrx Ltd. (Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-05231-MEJ). I agree to comply

8

with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and

9

acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature

10

of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that

11

is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance

12

with the provisions of this Order.

13

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the

14

Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective

15

Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.

16

I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of

17

_______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number]

18

as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings

19

related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.

20
21

Date: _________________________________

22

City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________

23
24
25
26

Printed name: ______________________________
[printed name]
Signature: __________________________________
[signature]

27
28
- 21 -

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER - CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ