Artifex Software, Inc. v. Entwrx Ltd.

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 Status Report filed by Artifex Software, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/23/2016. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003) dsnyder@omm.com DAVID J. SEPANIK (S.B. #221527) dsepanik@omm.com JESSE J. KOEHLER (S.B. #300530) jkoehler@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3823 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 Attorneys for Plaintiff ARTIFEX SOFTWARE, INC. 8 9 10 11 MICHAEL H. BIERMAN (S.B. #89156) michael.bierman@dentons.com DENTONS US LLP 300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 688-1000 Facsimile: (213) 243-6330 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant ENTWRX LTD. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO 17 18 ARTIFEX SOFTWARE, INC., Case No. 3:14-cv-05231-MEJ 19 Plaintiff, FEBRUARY 23, 2016 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 20 v. 21 ENTWRX LTD., 22 Defendant. 23 24 25 Plaintiff Artifex Software, Inc. (“Artifex”) and Defendant Entwrx Ltd. (“Entwrx”), 26 through their respective counsel of record, and subject to the approval of the Court, hereby agree 27 and stipulate as follows: 28 -1- JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ 1 1. The parties’ settlement discussions have continued since they filed their October 7, 2015 2 Joint Notice of Settlement in Principle, their December 17, 2015 Joint Status Report and 3 Stipulation, their January 8, 2016 Joint Status Report and Stipulation, and their February 1, 2016 4 Joint Status Report and Stipulation. 5 6 7 8 9 2. The parties continue to make progress toward finalizing the outstanding terms in a formal settlement agreement. 3. The parties would like to obtain additional time to exhaust their settlement efforts before the Court reinstates a case management order. 4. Given the parties’ continuing desire and effort to finalize a settlement agreement, good 10 cause exists, and the parties respectfully ask the Court, to grant the parties until March 7, 2016 to 11 finalize the remaining terms of the agreement. 12 13 DATED: February 23, 2016 14 Respectfully submitted, O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 15 By: 16 17 18 19 Attorneys for Plaintiff ARTIFEX SOFTWARE, INC. 20 21 22 /s/ Darin W. Snyder Darin W. Snyder O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 984-8700; Fax: (415) 984-8701 DATED: February 23, 2016 Respectfully submitted, DENTONS US LLP 23 By: 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Michael H. Bierman Michael H. Bierman DENTONS US LLP 300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, California 90071 Tel: (213) 688-1000; Fax: (213) 243-6330 Attorneys for Defendant ENTWRX LTD. -2- JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ 1 2 3 ATTESTATION Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed concurs in this filing’s content and has authorized the filing. 4 5 DATED: February 23, 2016 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 6 7 By: /s/ Darin W. Snyder Darin W. Snyder _ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ 1 2 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the foregoing Joint Status Report and Stipulation, the Court grants the parties until March 7, 2016 to file a stipulation for dismissal or additional status report. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 February 23, 2016 Dated: ________________________ 7 ______________________________________ Honorable Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05231-MEJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?