LEE et al v. Sephora USA, Inc. et al

Filing 49

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Dismissing Defendant LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton, Inc. filed by Hyejin Lee, Yolin Han, Ruiqi Ye. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/23/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2015)

1
2
3
4

ERIC F. YUHL (SBN 102051)
COLIN A. YUHL (SBN 259196)
YUHL CARR LLP
4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 550
Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

DOUGLAS H. WIGDOR (NY SBN 2609469)
DAVID E. GOTTLIEB (NY SBN 4415568)
JEANNE M. CHRISTENSEN (NY SBN 2622124)
ELIZABETH J. CHEN (NY SBN 5126214)
(Admitted pro hac vice)
WIGDOR LLP
85 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10003
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
HYEJIN LEE, RUIQI YE, YOLIN HAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

HYEJIN LEE, RUIQI YE and YOLIN
HAN, individually and on behalf of all
other similarly-situated individuals,
Plaintiffs,

Case No.: 3:14-cv-05237(EMC)

v.
SEPHORA USA, INC. and LVMH MOET
HENNESSY LOUIS VUITTON, INC.,
Defendants.

22
23
24

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING
DEFENDANT LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS VUITTON, INC.

25
26
27
28

Lee et al. v. Sephora USA, Inc., et al.

Stipulation and Proposed Order
Case No. 3:14-cv-05237-EMC

1

It is hereby stipulated, by and between Plaintiffs Hyejin Lee, Ruiqi Ye and Yolin Han

2

and Defendants Sephora USA, Inc. (“Sephora”) and LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton, Inc.

3

(“LVMH Inc.”):

4

1.

The parties agree to the dismissal, without prejudice, of LVMH Inc. as a

5
Defendant in this action.
6
7

2.

If LVMH Inc. is renamed as a party, this Stipulation shall be deemed null and

8

void. If LVMH Inc. is renamed as a party, however, LVMH Inc. retains all rights to bring an

9

appropriate motion to dismiss, motion for summary judgment, and/or motion for sanctions, to the

10

extent it determines such a motion is appropriate.

11
3.

Defendants agree that they will not make a motion for or otherwise seek costs,

12
13

fees, sanctions or any other similar relief related to the naming of LVMH Inc. as a Defendant in

14

the initial Complaint in this action. If LVMH Inc. is renamed as a party in a future pleading,

15

however, LVMH Inc. retains all rights to bring an appropriate motion for sanctions against

16

plaintiffs for renaming it, to the extent it determines such a motion is appropriate.

17
18

Dated: March 19, 2015
San Francisco, CA
Respectfully submitted,

19
20

YUHL CARR LLP

21

By: /s/ Colin A. Yuhl
Colin A. Yuhl
Eric F. Yuhl

22
23

4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 550
Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

24
25
26
27
28

Lee et al. v. Sephora USA, Inc., et al.

Stipulation and Proposed Order
Case No. 3:14-cv-05237-EMC

WIGDOR LLP

1
2

By: /s/ Jeanne M. Christensen
Douglas H. Wigdor
David E. Gottlieb
Jeanne M. Christensen
Elizabeth J. Chen

3
4
5
6

85 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10003
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
8
9
10
11

Counsel for Plaintiffs
12
13

BARACK FERRAZZANO KIRSCHBAUM
& NAGELBERG LLP

14
15

By:

16
17

/s/ Robert E. Shapiro
Robert E. Shapiro
Shermin Kruse
Krista N. Nelson

18
200 W. Madison Street, Suite 3900
Chicago, IL 60606
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Lee et al. v. Sephora USA, Inc., et al.

Stipulation and Proposed Order
Case No. 3:14-cv-05237-EMC

1

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
LLP

2
3

By:

4
5
6

/s/ Andrew R. Livingston
Andrew R. Livingston
Kathryn G. Mantoan

The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
8
9
10
11

Counsel for Defendants

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Lee et al. v. Sephora USA, Inc., et al.

Stipulation and Proposed Order
Case No. 3:14-cv-05237-EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1
2
3
4

HYEJIN LEE, RUIQI YE and YOLIN
HAN, individually and on behalf of all
other similarly-situated individuals,
Plaintiffs,

Case No.: 3:14-cv-05237(EMC)

[PROPOSED] ORDER

5
v.
6
7
8

SEPHORA USA, INC. and LVMH MOET
HENNESSY LOUIS VUITTON, INC.,
Defendants.

9
10

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant LVMH Moet

11
Hennessy Louis Vuitton, Inc. is dismissed as a defendant in this action without prejudice.

DISTRI

16

O
IT IS S

ard M.

NO

17

RT

18

dw
Judge E

ER

20

Chen

A

H

19

ORD

R NIA

15

LI

UNIT
ED

14

RT
U
O

CT
ES
______________________________
C
AT
T
Hon. Edward M. Chen
United States District Court Judge
Northern District of California
ERED

S

13

23

Date: March __, 2015

FO

12

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Lee et al. v. Sephora USA, Inc., et al.

Stipulation and Proposed Order
Case No. 3:14-cv-05237-EMC