Benson v. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC

Filing 13

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation., STIPULATION AND ORDER re 11 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC filed by Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/6/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2015)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAREK BENSON

,

CASE NO. C 3:14-cv-05240

Plaintiff(s),
v.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

TESORO REFINING & MARKETING
COMPANY LLC, and does 1-50
,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
☐
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
☐
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
X
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
☐
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
x
☐
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

☐

other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated: February 5, 2015

____/s/ Randal M. Barnum_____________
Randal M. Barnum
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: February 5, 2015

____/s/ William J. Dritsas______________
William J. Dritsas,
Attorney for Defendant Tesoro Refining &
Marketing Company LLC

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
[PROPOSED] ORDER

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

A

H

ER

LI

FO

R NIA

UNITED STATES JUDGE
n
M. Che
Edward
Judge

RT

UNIT
ED

Dated:

2/6/15

DERED
SO OR
T IS
I__________________________________

NO

RT
U
O

S

☐
☐

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
18968980v.1