Gillette v. Uber Technologies,Inc.

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 29 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CHANGING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION HEARING DATE filed by Uber Technologies,Inc. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 29 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CHANGING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION HEARING DATE, 16 MOTION to Compel Arbitration. Motion Hearing reset for 5/14/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/1/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

JOHN C. FISH, Jr., Bar No. 160620
[e-mail]
ROD M. FLIEGEL, Bar No. 168289
[e-mail]
ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, Bar No. 245998
[e-mail]
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, California 94108.2693
Telephone:
415.433.1940
Facsimile:
415.399.8490
Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

RONALD GILLETTE, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly-situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a
California corporation, and DOES 1-20,
inclusive,
Defendant.

Case No. 3:14-cv-05241-EMC
STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING
MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
HEARING DATE
Civil Local Rule 6-2
Complaint Filed: November 26, 2014
FAC Filed: December 15, 2014
Trial Date: None set.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA
94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING MTC
ARB HEARING DATE

1.

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05241 EMC

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber” or

2

“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Ronald Gillette (“Plaintiff”) (collectively “Parties”) hereby stipulate to

3

and request that the Court continue the hearing date for Uber’s motion to compel arbitration from

4

April 14, 2015 at 10:30 am to May 7, 2015 at 1:30 pm.

14

5

This change in time is requested because Uber’s client representative will be out of

6

the country on business on April 14, 2015 and will be unable to attend the hearing as currently

7

scheduled. Counsel for Defendant therefore requested a stipulation from counsel for Plaintiff to

8

continue the motion to compel arbitration hearing date. Plaintiff’s counsel agreed to request a

9

continuance of the motion to compel arbitration hearing and the next available date that worked for

10

all parties and the Court is May 7, 2015.

11

This request is not made for purposes of unnecessary delay, and none of the Parties

12

will be prejudiced by the granting of this request. The Parties have previously stipulated to several

13

time modifications.

14

Defendant’s time to file a responsive pleading. On February 5, 2015, in conjunction with the parties

15

in the related action Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. Case No. 14-05200 (“Mohamed”),

16

Plaintiff and Defendant stipulated to a consolidated briefing schedule regarding the motions to

17

compel arbitration in Mohamed and the instant action and requested that the Court continue the

18

March 12, 2015 case management conference and associated case management deadlines in order to

19

accommodate the consolidated briefing schedule.

20
21
22

On December 31, 2014, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulated to extend

This stipulated request will create only a slight delay with respect to the motion to
compel arbitration hearing date.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA
94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING MTC
ARB HEARING DATE

2.

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05241 EMC

1

Dated: March 31, 2015

/s/ Andrew M. Spurchise
Andrew M. Spurchise
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant Uber Technologies,
Inc.

2
3
4
5

Dated: March 31, 2015

/s/Andrew P. Lee
Andrew P. Lee
GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN &
HO
Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Gillette

6
7
8

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

9
10
11

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document.

12
13

/s/ Andrew M. Spurchise

Dated: March 31, 2015

ANDREW M. SPURCHISE

14
15
16
17

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

The motion hearing is
reset for 5/14/15 at
1:30 p.m.

18

23
Firmwide:132627007.1 073208.1047

RT

25

NO

24

RDE
IS SO O FIED
IT
DI
AS MO
J

ER

H

26

. Chen

ward M
udge Ed

FO

22

___________________________________
HON. EDWARD M. CHEN
RED

LI

UNIT
ED

21

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

20

R NIA

4/1
Dated: ______________, 2015

A

19

N

27

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA
94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING MTC
ARB HEARING DATE

3.

CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05241 EMC