Kentwool Company v. NetSuite Inc

Filing 84

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE re 83 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Kentwool Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 11, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2015)

1
2
3
4

HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER BOYD, P.A.
CHRISTOPHER B. MAJOR, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice)
BONNIE A. LYNCH, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice)
One North Main, 2nd Floor
Greenville, SC 29601-2119
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 864-240-3300

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP
WILLIAM F. MURPHY, ESQ. (SBN 82482)
TAYLOR F. FORD, ESQ. (SBN 297014)
601 California Street, Suite 1900
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff KENTWOOL COMPANY
GATTEY LAW OFFICE
SCOTT D. GATTEY, Esq. (SBN 180875)
1001 Laurel Street, Suite C
San Carlos, CA 94070
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 877-269-4437
Attorneys for Defendant NETSUITE INC.

16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NOTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19
20

KENTWOOL COMPANY,
Plaintiff,

21
22

v.

23

Case No. 14-cv-05264-JST
STIPULATION FOR AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE

NETSUITE INC.,

24

Defendant.

25
26

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff

27

KENTWOOL COMPANY (“Kentwool”) and defendant NETSUITE INC. (“NetSuite”), by and

28

through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate that the Court may enter an order dismissing
Page 1 – Case No. 14-cv-05264-JST

STIP/ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

1

this action, in its entirety (including Kentwool’s Amended Complaint, and NetSuite’s

2

Counterclaim), with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

3

Dated: September 9, 2015

4

DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP
WILLIAM M. MURPHY, ESQ.
TAYLOR F. FORD, ESQ.

5
By: ____/s/ William F. Murphy_____________
Attorneys for Plaintiff Kentwool Company

6
7

Dated: September 9, 2015

8
9

GATTEY LAW OFFICE
SCOTT GATTEY, ESQ.
By: ___/s/ Scott D. Gattey___________________
Attorneys for Defendant NetSuite Inc.

10
11
12

ORDER

13

The Court, having reviewed for preceding Stipulation, and good cause appearing,

14

hereby ORDERS that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, including

15

Kentwool’s Amended Complaint and NetSuite’s Counterclaim, each party to bear its own

16

attorneys’ fees and costs.

17

19
20

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

R NIA

UNIT
ED

S

September 11, 2015
Dated: September 14, 2015.

RT
U
O

18

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

21

J

24
25

A

H

ER

LI

RT

23

FO

NO

__________________________________
S . Ti ga r
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
d ge J o n
u

22

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

26
27
28
Page 2 – Case No. 14-cv-05264-JST

STIP/ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

C