Breazeale et al v. Victim Services, Inc. d/b/a CorrectiveSolutions et al
Filing
68
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 67 Stipulation re Briefing Schedule.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
KEVIN BREAZEALE, KAREN SOLBERG,
KEVIN HIEP VU, NANCY MORIN, and
NARISHA BONAKDAR on their own behalf
and on behalf of others similarly situated,
7
10
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Plaintiffs,
8
9
Civ. No. 3:14-cv-05266-VC
VICTIM SERVICES, INC., d/b/a
CorrectiveSolutions, NATIONAL
CORRECTIVE GROUP, INC., d/b/a
CorrectiveSolutions, and MATS JONSSON,
11
Defendants.
12
13
14
I.
STIPULATION
15
16
17
18
19
On August 3, 2015, Defendants filed their Notice of Appeal of the Court’s July 16, 2015
order denying Defendants’ special motion to strike pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute.
See Dkt. No. 65.
On August 4, 2015, a further case management conference took place.
Following this conference, the parties have stipulated and request that the Court set the following
20
briefing schedule for Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Appeal as Frivolous and Defendants’ Motion
21
to Confirm Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal (collectively, the “Motions”). See Dkt. No. 66.
22
•
The Motions will be filed no later than August 10, 2015.
23
•
Responses to the Motions shall be filed no later than August 24, 2015.
24
•
Replies to the Motions shall be filed no later than August 31, 2015.
25
•
The Motions will be noticed for hearing on September 10, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.
26
27
28
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED
2
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED AND DATED this 5th day of August, 2015.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
I.
26
TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT
& WILLIE PLLC
FREEDMAN & TAITELMAN, LLP
By: /s/ Beth E. Terrell
Beth E. Terrell
Email: bterrell@tmdwlaw.com
936 North 34th Street, Suite 300
Seattle, Washington 98103-8869
Telephone: (206) 816-6603
Facsimile: (206) 350-3528
By: /s/ Michael A. Taitelman
Michael A. Taitelman
Email: mtaitelman@ftllp.com
Sean M. Hardy
Email: smhardy@ftllp.com
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 500
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (310) 201-0005
Facsimile: (310) 201-0045
Paul Arons
Email: lopa@rockisland.com
LAW OFFICE OF PAUL ARONS
685 Spring Street, Suite 104
Friday Harbor, Washington 98250
Telephone: (360) 378-6496
Facsimile: (360) 378-6498
Attorneys for Defendants Victim Services,
Inc., National Corrective Group, Inc., and
Mats Jonsson
Deepak Gupta
Email: deepak@guptabeck.com
GUPTA BECK PLLC
1735 20th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20009
Telephone: (202) 888-1741
Facsimile: (202) 888-7792
Michael F. Ram
Email: mram@rocklawcal.com
Susan S. Brown
Email: sbrown@rocklawcal.com
Karl Olson
Email: kolson@rocklawcal.com
RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO
KOPCZYNSKI
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 433-4949
Facsimile: (415) 433-7311
&
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
27
28
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE
1
II.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiffs shall file their Motion to
3
Certify the Appeal as Frivolous by August 10, 2015. Defendants shall file their Motion to
4
Confirm Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal by August 10, 2015. Responses to both motions
5
6
shall be filed on or before August 24, 2015. Replies to both motions shall be filed on or before
August 31, 2015.
7
8
9
6th
DATED this _____ day of August, 2015.
10
11
THE HONORABLE VINCE CHHABRIA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?