Breazeale et al v. Victim Services, Inc. d/b/a CorrectiveSolutions et al

Filing 68

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 67 Stipulation re Briefing Schedule.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 KEVIN BREAZEALE, KAREN SOLBERG, KEVIN HIEP VU, NANCY MORIN, and NARISHA BONAKDAR on their own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, 7 10 CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE Plaintiffs, 8 9 Civ. No. 3:14-cv-05266-VC VICTIM SERVICES, INC., d/b/a CorrectiveSolutions, NATIONAL CORRECTIVE GROUP, INC., d/b/a CorrectiveSolutions, and MATS JONSSON, 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 I. STIPULATION 15 16 17 18 19 On August 3, 2015, Defendants filed their Notice of Appeal of the Court’s July 16, 2015 order denying Defendants’ special motion to strike pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute. See Dkt. No. 65. On August 4, 2015, a further case management conference took place. Following this conference, the parties have stipulated and request that the Court set the following 20 briefing schedule for Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Appeal as Frivolous and Defendants’ Motion 21 to Confirm Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal (collectively, the “Motions”). See Dkt. No. 66. 22 • The Motions will be filed no later than August 10, 2015. 23 • Responses to the Motions shall be filed no later than August 24, 2015. 24 • Replies to the Motions shall be filed no later than August 31, 2015. 25 • The Motions will be noticed for hearing on September 10, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. 26 27 28 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED 2 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED AND DATED this 5th day of August, 2015. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I. 26 TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE PLLC FREEDMAN & TAITELMAN, LLP By: /s/ Beth E. Terrell Beth E. Terrell Email: bterrell@tmdwlaw.com 936 North 34th Street, Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98103-8869 Telephone: (206) 816-6603 Facsimile: (206) 350-3528 By: /s/ Michael A. Taitelman Michael A. Taitelman Email: mtaitelman@ftllp.com Sean M. Hardy Email: smhardy@ftllp.com 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 500 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 201-0005 Facsimile: (310) 201-0045 Paul Arons Email: lopa@rockisland.com LAW OFFICE OF PAUL ARONS 685 Spring Street, Suite 104 Friday Harbor, Washington 98250 Telephone: (360) 378-6496 Facsimile: (360) 378-6498 Attorneys for Defendants Victim Services, Inc., National Corrective Group, Inc., and Mats Jonsson Deepak Gupta Email: deepak@guptabeck.com GUPTA BECK PLLC 1735 20th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 Telephone: (202) 888-1741 Facsimile: (202) 888-7792 Michael F. Ram Email: mram@rocklawcal.com Susan S. Brown Email: sbrown@rocklawcal.com Karl Olson Email: kolson@rocklawcal.com RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO KOPCZYNSKI 555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 433-4949 Facsimile: (415) 433-7311 & Attorneys for Plaintiffs 27 28 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 II. [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiffs shall file their Motion to 3 Certify the Appeal as Frivolous by August 10, 2015. Defendants shall file their Motion to 4 Confirm Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal by August 10, 2015. Responses to both motions 5 6 shall be filed on or before August 24, 2015. Replies to both motions shall be filed on or before August 31, 2015. 7 8 9 6th DATED this _____ day of August, 2015. 10 11 THE HONORABLE VINCE CHHABRIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?