Nguyen v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada et al

Filing 16

ORDER GRANTING re 15 Stipulation For Further Extension of Time To Respond to Complaint filed by Power Advocate, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan, Power Advocate, Inc. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/15/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

JORDAN ALTURA (SBN: 209431)
[e-mail]
AMY MACLEAR (SBN: 215638)
[e-mail]
GORDON & REES LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
POWER ADVOCATE, INC. and POWER ADVOCATE,
INC. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

Gordon & Rees LLP

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

ERIC NGUYEN, an individual,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF )
CANADA; POWER ADVOCATE, INC; )
POWER ADVOCATE, INC. EMPLOYEE )
BENEFIT PLAN
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3-14-cv-05295 JCS
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 2-14-CV-557 JCS

1
2
3

Plaintiff ERIC NGUYEN (“Plaintiff”) served the Complaint in this matter on Defendants
POWER ADVOCATE, INC. and POWER ADVOCATE, INC. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
(“Defendants”), on December 8, 2014. The response was therefore due on December 29, 2014.

4
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 6.1, Plaintiff and Defendants previously stipulated
5
that Defendants shall have up to and including January 15, 2015 to answer or otherwise respond
6
to the Complaint. During this time, the parties, through counsel, engaged in discussions geared
7
toward a possible informal resolution.
8
9
10

Gordon & Rees LLP

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

11

The parties’ efforts toward an information resolution are still underway and therefore,
they stipulate pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6.1 to a further extension of time to January 30, 2015
for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
Respectfully submitted,

12
13

Dated: January 14, 2015

THE GREY LAW FIRM, P.C.

14
By:

/s/ P. Lauren Ruby
Rebecca Grey
P. Lauren Ruby
Attorneys for Plaintiff ERIC NGUYEN

15
16
17
18
19

Dated: January 14. 2015

GORDON & REES LLP

20
By:
21
22
23
24

/s/ Amy Maclear
Jordan Altura
Amy Maclear
Attorneys for Defendants
POWER ADVOCATE, INC. and POWER
ADVOCATE, INC. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT
PLAN

25
26
27
28

-1JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 2-14-CV-557 JCS

ATTESTATION

1
2
3

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other
Signatory, which shall serve in lieu of their signature on the document.

4
5

Dated: January 14, 2015

/s/ Amy Maclear
Amy Maclear

6
7
8
9
10

Gordon & Rees LLP

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 1/15/15
/s/ Joseph C. Spero
Chief United States Magistrate Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1096632/20086738v.1
1101891/21878442v.1

-2JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 2-14-CV-557 JCS