Nguyen v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada et al

Filing 27

SCHEDULING ORDER. Motion Hearing set for 4/23/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Bench Trial set for 10/26/2015 at 2:00 PM before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 11, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

ERIC NGUYEN,

Case No. 14-cv-05295-JST

Plaintiff,
9
v.

SCHEDULING ORDER

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF
CANADA,
Defendant.

13
14
15

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

16
Event

Deadline

17
Opening brief re: standard of review

3/20/15

Opposition brief re: standard of review

4/2/15

20

Reply brief re: standard of review

4/9/15

21

Hearing re: standard of review

4/23/15 at 2:00 p.m.

22

Discovery cut-off date

8/21/15

Deadline to file cross-motions for summary judgment

9/25/15

Deadline to file oppositions

10/9/15

Hearing date for motions for judgment

10/26/15 at 2:00 p.m.

18
19

23
24
25
26
27
28

1
2
3

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire

4

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely

5

manner and appear on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their calendars

6

to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.

7

Dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-

9

controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above hearing date as good cause to

10

grant a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

8

cause to grant a continuance.

12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13

Dated: March 11, 2015

14
15
16

_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2