Machado Brothers Inc. v. Yerba Buena Engineering & Construction, Inc.,et al

Filing 26

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 25 Stipulation of Dismissal. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MARA E. ROSALES, State Bar No. 104844 mara@rosaleslawpartners.com Kris A. Cox, State Bar No.136504 kcoxesq@yahoo.com ROSALES LAW PARTNERS LLP 433 California Street, Suite 630 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 986-4760 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and YERBA BUENA ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC 7 8 9 WILLIAM W. HATCHER, JR. State Bar No. 154664 Hatcher & Rundel 114 Pierce Street Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Telephone: (707) 542-1921 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff MACHADO BROTHERS, INC. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of MACHADO BROTHERS, INC., 16 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05296-MEJ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 17 vs. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James 18 19 20 21 22 YERBA BUENA ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California Corporation, and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Massachusetts Corporation; and Does 1 through 50, Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Case No. 3:14-cv-05296-MEJ 1 STIPULATION 2 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned attorneys for the 3 parties that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), the above-referenced 4 case, including all requests for relief, whether in the Complaint, and Defendant’s Counterclaim 5 or elsewhere, should be DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice and without an award of 6 costs or fees to any party. Stipulated to and presented to the Court on this 10th day of February 2016. 7 8 Dated: February 10, 2016 ROSALES LAW PARTNERS LLP 9 By: /s/ Kris A. Cox MARA E. ROSALES KRIS A. COX Attorneys for Defendants LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and YERBA BUENA ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. 10 11 12 13 14 Dated: February 10, 2016 HATCHER & RUNDEL 15 By: /s/ William W. Hatcher, Jr. WILLIAM W. HATCHER, JR. Attorneys for Plaintiff MACHADO BROTHERS, INC. 16 17 18 19 20 ORDER 21 The parties having so stipulated and agreed, it is hereby SO ORDERED. The above- 22 referenced case is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice and without an award of 23 costs or fees to any party. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of 24 record. 25 26 Dated: February 11 2016 ___________, 27 28 The Honorable Maria-Elena James United States District Court Magistrate Judge 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Case No. 3:14-cv-05296-MEJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?